134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12747498)
1. Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?
Nelson DL; McKinney VM; McEvoy CL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12747498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL; Holley PE; Stelnicki GS
Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 1388861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: the effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task.
Taconnat L; Froger C; Sacher M; Isingrini M
Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18271350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT
Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories.
Nelson DL; Gee NR; Schreiber TA
Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):643-54. PubMed ID: 1435267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.
Nelson DL; Xu J
Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):203-14. PubMed ID: 7753950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
Shaw RJ; Craik FI
Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prior knowledge and memory: the influence of natural category size as a function of intention and distraction.
Nelson DL; Bajo MT; Casanueva D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1985 Jan; 11(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 3156954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adult age differences in implicit and explicit memory: time course and encoding effects.
Chiarello C; Hoyer WJ
Psychol Aging; 1988 Dec; 3(4):358-66. PubMed ID: 3268280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual and semantic support for paired-associates recall in young and older adults.
Sharps MJ; Antonelli JR
J Genet Psychol; 1997 Sep; 158(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 9255961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recall and recognition measures of paired associate learning in healthy aging.
Lowndes GJ; Saling MM; Ames D; Chiu E; Gonzalez LM; Savage G
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 Jul; 15(4):506-22. PubMed ID: 18584342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.
Higham PA; Tam H
Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):148-57. PubMed ID: 16686114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age, rate and instructional conditions: empirical support against the pacing variable.
Winn FJ; Elias JW
Exp Aging Res; 1977; 3(4-6):305-24. PubMed ID: 604075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inhibition of associates and activation of synonyms in the rare-word paradigm: Further evidence for a center--surround mechanism.
Barnhardt TM; Glisky EL; Polster MR; Elam L
Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 8822158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Priming and aging: further evidence of preserved memory function.
Java RI; Gardiner JM
Am J Psychol; 1991; 104(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 2058759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How does delayed testing reduce effects of implicit memory: context infusion or cuing with context?
Nelson DL; Goodmon LB; Ceo D
Mem Cognit; 2007 Jul; 35(5):1014-23. PubMed ID: 17910185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cue set size effects: sampling activated associates or cross-target interference?
Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Xu J
Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):465-77. PubMed ID: 10355236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
