These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12747501)

  • 1. Decision-bound theory and the influence of familiarity.
    Verguts T; Storms G; Tuerlinckx F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 12747501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What information underlies correct rejections in short-term recognition memory?
    Johns EE; Mewhort DJ
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 11958354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sequence effects in categorization of simple perceptual stimuli.
    Stewart N; Brown GD; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11831211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions.
    Ashby FG; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):598-612. PubMed ID: 2144574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of template complexity on visual search and dual-task performance.
    Bourke PA; Duncan J
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Mar; 16(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15733201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Base-rate effects in multidimensional perceptual categorization.
    Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):288-301. PubMed ID: 7738501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response times seen as decompression times in Boolean concept use.
    Bradmetz J; Mathy F
    Psychol Res; 2008 Mar; 72(2):211-34. PubMed ID: 17093950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting infant looking: the event set x event set design.
    Bogartz RS; Shinskey JL; Speaker CJ
    Dev Psychol; 1997 May; 33(3):408-22. PubMed ID: 9149920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of stimulus properties on category construction.
    Milton F; Wills AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):407-15. PubMed ID: 14979814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.
    Love BC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):829-35. PubMed ID: 12613690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metacognition in psychophysical judgment: an unfolding view of comparative judgments of mental workload.
    Petrusic WM; Cloutier P
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):485-99. PubMed ID: 1594438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High familiarity enhances visual change detection for face stimuli.
    Buttle H; Raymond JE
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1296-306. PubMed ID: 14710963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Size congruity effects with two-digit numbers: expanding the number line?
    Fitousi D; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):445-57. PubMed ID: 16752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working memory costs of task switching.
    Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization.
    Maddox WT; Ashby FG
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jan; 53(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 8433906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accessing information in working memory: can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time?
    Oberauer K; Bialkova S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):64-87. PubMed ID: 19203170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process.
    Petrusic WM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):962-86. PubMed ID: 1431758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.