These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Testing architectures of the decision-confidence relation. Baranski JV; Petrusic WM Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Sep; 55(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 11605555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Probing the locus of confidence judgments: experiments on the time to determine confidence. Baranski JV; Petrusic WM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):929-45. PubMed ID: 9627426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A model for realism of confidence judgments: implications for underconfidence in sensory discrimination. Ferrell WR Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):246-54; discussion 255-9. PubMed ID: 7885823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Wakslak C; Trope Y Psychol Sci; 2009 Jan; 20(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19076317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidence in masked orientation judgments is informed by both evidence and visibility. Rausch M; Hellmann S; Zehetleitner M Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):134-154. PubMed ID: 29043657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Higher order sequential effects in psychophysical judgments. Petzold P; Haubensak G Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 11578058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination: the underconfidence phenomenon. Björkman M; Juslin P; Winman A Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 8351190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous modeling of choice, confidence, and response time in visual perception. Hellmann S; Zehetleitner M; Rausch M Psychol Rev; 2023 Nov; 130(6):1521-1543. PubMed ID: 36913292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled? Tokita M; Ishiguchi A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1839-53. PubMed ID: 20952782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing models of decision making using confidence ratings in classification. Balakrishnan JD; Ratcliff R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):615-33. PubMed ID: 8666956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries. Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-training of dynamic touch: striking improves judgment by wielding. Stephen DG; Arzamarski R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1717-23. PubMed ID: 19933557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence. Pleskac TJ; Busemeyer JR Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):864-901. PubMed ID: 20658856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 2. Confidence analysis. Yi Y; Wang W; Merfeld DM J Neurophysiol; 2019 Sep; 122(3):904-921. PubMed ID: 31215314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. No Effect of Cue Format on Automation Dependence in an Aided Signal Detection Task. Bartlett ML; McCarley JS Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):169-190. PubMed ID: 30335518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]