BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12748496)

  • 1. Combined use of magnetic resonance imaging, CA 125 assay, histologic type, and histologic grade in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.
    Todo Y; Sakuragi N; Nishida R; Yamada T; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Fujimoto S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 May; 188(5):1265-72. PubMed ID: 12748496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preoperative evaluation and a nomogram prediction model for pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
    Zhang J; Wang D; Peng L; Shi X; Shi Y; Zhang G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108230. PubMed ID: 38430704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lymphadenectomy can be omitted for low-risk endometrial cancer based on preoperative assessments.
    Mitamura T; Watari H; Todo Y; Kato T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Sakuragi N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):301-5. PubMed ID: 25142623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
    Kang S; Nam JH; Bae DS; Kim JW; Kim MH; Chen X; No JH; Lee JM; Kim JH; Watari H; Kim SM; Kim SH; Seong SJ; Kim KT; Kim SC; Kim JH; Lim MC; Lee JY; Ryu SY; Yang B; Kim BG
    Cancer; 2017 Jan; 123(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 28067948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Review of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: Extraperitoneal Approach May Have the Advantage over Intraperitoneal Approach.
    Imai K; Hirooka-Nakama J; Hotta Y; Shigeta H
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2024; 13(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 38487605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nodal infiltration in endometrial cancer: a prediction model using best subset regression.
    Matsumoto YK; Himoto Y; Nishio M; Kikkawa N; Otani S; Ito K; Yamanoi K; Kato T; Fujimoto K; Kurata Y; Moribata Y; Yoshida H; Minamiguchi S; Mandai M; Kido A; Nakamoto Y
    Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3375-3384. PubMed ID: 37882835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of correlation of pre-therapeutic assessment and the final diagnosis in endometrial cancer: role of tumor volume in the magnetic resonance imaging.
    López-González E; García-Jiménez R; Rodríguez-Jiménez A; Rojas-Luna JA; Daza-Manzano C; Gómez-Salgado J; Álvarez RM
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219818. PubMed ID: 37655105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Values of tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging for a surgical approach to endometrial cancer.
    López-González E; Rodríguez-Jiménez A; Rojas-Luna JA; Daza-Manzano C; Gómez-Salgado J
    Cancer Med; 2023 Sep; 12(17):17671-17678. PubMed ID: 37602828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volume Index Measured Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Diagnosing Cervical Cancer Tumors <2 cm.
    Imai K; Chikazawa K; Kuwata T; Konno R
    In Vivo; 2023; 37(4):1786-1789. PubMed ID: 37369483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overall survival prediction models for gynecological endometrioid adenocarcinoma with squamous differentiation (GE-ASqD) using machine-learning algorithms.
    Liu X; Jin S; Zi D
    Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8395. PubMed ID: 37225749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive model for the preoperative assessment and prognostic modeling of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
    Asami Y; Hiranuma K; Takayanagi D; Matsuda M; Shimada Y; Kato MK; Kuno I; Murakami N; Komatsu M; Hamamoto R; Kohno T; Sekizawa A; Matsumoto K; Kato T; Yoshida H; Shiraishi K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19004. PubMed ID: 36347927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preoperative pelvic MRI and 2-[
    Fasmer KE; Gulati A; Dybvik JA; Wagner-Larsen KS; Lura N; Salvesen Ø; Forsse D; Trovik J; Pijnenborg JMA; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IS
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):221-232. PubMed ID: 35763096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Volume Index is a Risk Factor for Recurrence Even in Patients with Clinical Stage IA Endometrial Cancer Undergoing either Laparotomy or Laparoscopy: A Retrospective Study.
    Chikazawa K; Netsu S; Imai K; Kimura A; Kuwata T; Konno R
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2022; 11(2):94-99. PubMed ID: 35746912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The prognosis of endometrial cancers stratified with conventional risk factors and modified molecular classification.
    Yamazaki H; Asano H; Hatanaka KC; Matsuoka R; Konno Y; Matsuno Y; Hatanaka Y; Watari H
    Cancer Sci; 2022 Sep; 113(9):3134-3147. PubMed ID: 35707843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative Measurement of Progesterone Receptor Immunohistochemical Expression to Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer.
    Hsiao YY; Fu HC; Wu CH; Lan J; Ou YC; Tsai CC; Lin H
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 35453837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tumoral volume measured preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging is related to survival in endometrial cancer.
    Coronado PJ; Santiago-López J; Santiago-García J; Méndez R; Fasero M; Herraiz MA
    Radiol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 55(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 33885237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lymphadenectomy issues in endometrial cancer.
    Konno Y; Asano H; Shikama A; Aoki D; Tanikawa M; Oki A; Horie K; Mitsuhashi A; Kikuchi A; Tokunaga H; Terao Y; Satoh T; Ushijima K; Ishikawa M; Yaegashi N; Watari H
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e25. PubMed ID: 33470067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is the predictive value of preoperative CA 125 level on the survival rate of type 1 endometrial cancer?
    Yilmaz Baran Ş; Alemdaroğlu S; Doğan Durdağ G; Yüksel Şimşek S; Bolat F; Köse F; Çelik H
    Turk J Med Sci; 2021 Feb; 51(1):335-341. PubMed ID: 32979897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study.
    Reijnen C; Gogou E; Visser NCM; Engerud H; Ramjith J; van der Putten LJM; van de Vijver K; Santacana M; Bronsert P; Bulten J; Hirschfeld M; Colas E; Gil-Moreno A; Reques A; Mancebo G; Krakstad C; Trovik J; Haldorsen IS; Huvila J; Koskas M; Weinberger V; Bednarikova M; Hausnerova J; van der Wurff AAM; Matias-Guiu X; Amant F; ; Massuger LFAG; Snijders MPLM; Küsters-Vandevelde HVN; Lucas PJF; Pijnenborg JMA
    PLoS Med; 2020 May; 17(5):e1003111. PubMed ID: 32413043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.