These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12749465)

  • 1. Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 12749465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causal judgment as evaluation of evidence: the use of confirmation and disconfirmatory information.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):491-513. PubMed ID: 12814099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgements of the other cause.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):999-1021. PubMed ID: 16194945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighting of contingency information in causal judgement: evidence of hypothesis dependence and use of a positive-test strategy.
    Mandel DR; Vartanian O
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2388-408. PubMed ID: 19391044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for occurrences: a new view of the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):204-18. PubMed ID: 18194063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal judgment from contingency information: a systematic test of the pCI rule.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Apr; 32(3):353-68. PubMed ID: 15285120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does temporal contiguity moderate contingency learning in a speeded performance task?
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):408-25. PubMed ID: 22224822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judgement of two causal candidates from contingency information: effects of relative prevalence of the two causes.
    White P
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):961-91. PubMed ID: 15370512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal judgment from contingency information: relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Apr; 28(3):415-26. PubMed ID: 10881559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.
    De Houwer J; Vandorpe S; Beckers T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):418-32. PubMed ID: 17366309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit contributions of context to recognition.
    Manier D; Apetroaia I; Pappas Z; Hirst W
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Sep; 13(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 15336242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgement.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):977-1007. PubMed ID: 12881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The causal asymmetry.
    White PA
    Psychol Rev; 2006 Jan; 113(1):132-47. PubMed ID: 16478304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the weighting and choice of evidence for plausible versus implausible causes.
    Goedert KM; Ellefson MR; Rehder B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):683-702. PubMed ID: 24417328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Causal judgment from contingency information: the interpretation of factors common to all instances.
    White PA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Sep; 26(5):1083-102. PubMed ID: 11009246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of the number of relevant causes on the processing of covariation information in causal reasoning.
    Kim K; Markman AB; Kim TH
    Cogn Process; 2016 Nov; 17(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 27312597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of object animacy on the appraisal of causality.
    Falmier O; Young ME
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):473-500. PubMed ID: 18792720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.