These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12749469)

  • 1. All parts of an item are not equal: effects of phonological redundancy on immediate recall.
    Service E; Maury S
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 12749469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forgetting and redintegration of consonants and vowels in pseudoword lists.
    Service E; Maury S; Luotoniemi E
    Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):340-8. PubMed ID: 15948619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reexamining the phonological similarity effect in immediate serial recall: the roles of type of similarity, category cuing, and item recall.
    Gupta P; Lipinski J; Aktunc E
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1001-16. PubMed ID: 16496721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rhyming words and onset-rime constituents: an inquiry into structural breaking points and emergent boundaries in the syllable.
    Geudens A; Sandra D; Martensen H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2005 Dec; 92(4):366-87. PubMed ID: 16139292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age and redintegration in immediate memory and their relationship to task difficulty.
    Neale K; Tehan G
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1940-53. PubMed ID: 18265610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
    Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
    Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation.
    Cluff MS; Luce PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):551-63. PubMed ID: 2144570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.
    Lian A; Karlsen PJ
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Mar; 32(2):223-34. PubMed ID: 15190715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Demonstrating the effects of phonological similarity and frequency on item and order memory in Down syndrome using process dissociation.
    Smith E; Jarrold C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Dec; 128():69-87. PubMed ID: 25089885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The phonological similarity effect in immediate recall: positions of shared phonemes.
    Li X; Schweickert R; Gandour J
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1116-25. PubMed ID: 11126935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The phonological similarity effect in short-term memory serial recall in schizophrenia.
    Elvevåg B; Weinberger DR; Goldberg TE
    Psychiatry Res; 2002 Sep; 112(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 12379453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate free recall of drug names: effects of similarity and availability.
    Lambert BL; Chang KY; Lin SJ
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2003 Jan; 60(2):156-68. PubMed ID: 12561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nature of the phonological processing in French dyslexic children: evidence for the phonological syllable and linguistic features' role in silent reading and speech discrimination.
    Maïonchi-Pino N; Magnan A; Ecalle J
    Ann Dyslexia; 2010 Dec; 60(2):123-50. PubMed ID: 20533097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term-memory recall of repeated and novel word lists.
    Coltheart V
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):539-45. PubMed ID: 8350745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a modality effect? Evidence for visual recency and suffix effects.
    Battacchi MW; Pelamatti GM; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Nov; 18(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 2266866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.