BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1274953)

  • 1. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Am J Epidemiol; 1976 May; 103(5):512-7. PubMed ID: 1274953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term mass screening in uterine cervical carcinoma eradication strategy.
    Shiromizu K; Ogawa M; Kamata H; Tominaga K; Koyama Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1990 Jun; 20(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 2370691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of pre-invasive conditions during opportunistic screening and its effectiveness on cervical cancer incidence in one Norwegian county.
    Forsmo S; Buhaug H; Skjeldestad FE; Haugen OA
    Int J Cancer; 1997 Mar; 71(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 9096657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
    van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of cervical cancer screening.
    Gustafsson L; Adami HO
    Cancer Causes Control; 1992 Mar; 3(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 1562702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiological evidence for two components of cervical cancer.
    Hakama M; Penttinen J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Mar; 88(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 7470410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of population screening for carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Finland.
    Hakama M
    Maturitas; 1985 May; 7(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 4021826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Therapy for cervical cancer detected by mass screening.
    Yajima A; Sato S; Higashiiwai H; Mori T; Wada Y; Yamauchi R; Uehara S; Suzuki M
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1983 Dec; 141(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 6670100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of cervical cancer among an electrocoagulated population.
    Kauraniemi T; Räsänen-Virtanen U; Hakama M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 131(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 307910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Letter: Increase of premalignant cervical lesions in teenagers.
    Punnonen R; Grönroos M; Peltonen R
    Lancet; 1974 Oct; 2(7886):949. PubMed ID: 4138326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epithelial dysplasia of the cervix uteri. The population screening for cervical carcinoma in the County of Maribo, 1967-69.
    Berget A
    Dan Med Bull; 1974 Aug; 21(5):169-71. PubMed ID: 4851895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experience in screening for cervical cancer in rural areas of Barsi Tehsil (Maharashtra).
    Nene BM; Jayant K; Malvi SG; Dale PS; Deshpande R
    Indian J Cancer; 1994 Mar; 31(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8063335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ.
    Morrison BJ; Coldman AJ; Boyes DA; Anderson GH
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Sep; 74(5):814-9. PubMed ID: 8795587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical carcinoma in Frederiksberg borough: the influence of population screening on incidence and stage distribution of invasive cases.
    Gad C
    Dan Med Bull; 1976 May; 23(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 949913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.
    Hamers FF; Duport N; Beltzer N
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28362653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of preinvasive cancer of the cervix and the subsequent reduction in invasive cancer.
    Bergström R; Adami HO; Gustafsson L; Pontén J; Sparén P
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jul; 85(13):1050-7. PubMed ID: 8515491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective screening for cervical cancer. Experience of the Finnish mass screening system.
    Hakama M; Pukkala E
    Br J Prev Soc Med; 1977 Dec; 31(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 597677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963-1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence.
    Anttila A; Pukkala E; Söderman B; Kallio M; Nieminen P; Hakama M
    Int J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 83(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10449609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of cytologic screening on the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Yajima A; Mori T; Sato S; Wakisaka T; Suzuki M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 7070726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.