These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1275008)
1. An association between the Dalkon Shield and complicated pregnancies among women hospitalized for intrauterine contraceptive device--related disorders. Kahn HS; Tyler CW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 1275008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Was the Dalkon Shield a safe and effective intrauterine device? The conflict between case-control and clinical trial study findings. Mumford SD; Kessel E Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1151-76. PubMed ID: 1601137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems. Sivin I Contraception; 1993 Jul; 48(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 8403900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of infections associated with the intrauterine contraceptive device in an isolated community. Mead PB; Beecham JB; Maeck JV Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 125(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 1275017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomized comparative trial of the Gravigard, Latex Leaf, Dalkon Shield and Multiload Cu 250 IUDs. McCarthy TG; Chew SC; Lim SM; Cheng MC; Ratnam SS Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 3545173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IUD-related hospitalizations. United States and Puerto Rico, 1973. Kahn HS; Tyler CW JAMA; 1975 Oct; 234(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 1174224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiologic demonstration of pelvic abscess associated with I.U.D. (Dalkon Shield) in two patients (author's transl)]. Vanstraelen L; Ponette E; Baert AL; Ovreeide S; Van Rijkel JP J Belge Radiol; 1981; 64(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 7320015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical records in litigation: the Dalkon Shield story. Byrne K AMRO; 1992 Feb; 32(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 10117045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Current trends. IUD safety: report of a nationwide physician survey. Morb Mortal; 1974 Jul; 23(26):1-2. PubMed ID: 12306730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Dalkon Shield in perspective. Pendergast P; Hirsh HL Med Law; 1986; 5(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 3515100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term study of the safety of the Dalkon Shield and Gyne-T 200 intrauterine devices. Rioux JE; Cloutier D; Dupont P; Lamonde D CMAJ; 1986 Apr; 134(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 3948091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postpartum and postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Martorella LA; Esposito JM J Reprod Med; 1975 Apr; 14(4):178-81. PubMed ID: 1142352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pelvic inflammatory disease with intrauterine device use: a reassessment. Kessel E Fertil Steril; 1989 Jan; 51(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 2642807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Dalkon Shield debate. Goodhue PA Conn Med; 1983 Mar; 47(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 6851548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current assessment of the use of intrauterine devices. Westhoff CL J Nurse Midwifery; 1996; 41(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 8708805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]