These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1275048)
1. A comparison of four projection perimeters. Portney GL; Hanible JE Am J Ophthalmol; 1976 May; 81(5):678-81. PubMed ID: 1275048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of four projection perimeters. Instrument specifications. Portney GL; Hanible JE Surv Ophthalmol; 1975; 20(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 1198320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Trope GE; Britton R Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)]. Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects. Heijl A; Drance SM Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 May; 99(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 7236085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode. Mills RP Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 6717919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simulator for teaching visual field techniques on Goldmann or Goldmann-type perimeters. Hass I; Drance SM; Fairclough M Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Aug; 88(2):259-60. PubMed ID: 474698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Threshold equivalence between perimeters. Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry. Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Goldmann perimeter with high luminance chromatic targets. Lakowski R; Wright WD; Oliver K Can J Ophthalmol; 1977 Jul; 12(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 890591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk. Batko KA; Anctil JL; Anderson DR Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 95(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 6837687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters. Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jun; 87(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 12770962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative evaluation of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters. Johnson CA; Keltner JL Ophthalmology; 1980 Aug; 87(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 7443210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma. Levy NS; Ellis E Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical experience with the Fieldmaster perimeter. Bobrow JC; Drews RC Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 93(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 7065096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Objective visual field measurement using "pupil perimetry"]. Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Mukuno K; Ishikawa S Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 100(10):825-31. PubMed ID: 8937108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]