158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12751283)
1. Accuracy and reproducibility of CFD predicted wall shear stress using 3D ultrasound images.
Augst AD; Barratt DC; Hughes AD; Glor FP; McG Thom SA; Xu XY
J Biomech Eng; 2003 Apr; 125(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 12751283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Various issues relating to computational fluid dynamics simulations of carotid bifurcation flow based on models reconstructed from three-dimensional ultrasound images.
Augst AD; Barratt DC; Hughes AD; Thom SA; Xu XY
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 14558652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-based carotid flow reconstruction: a comparison between MRI and ultrasound.
Glor FP; Ariff B; Hughes AD; Crowe LA; Verdonck PR; Barratt DC; McG Thom SA; Firmin DN; Xu XY
Physiol Meas; 2004 Dec; 25(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 15712727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of numerical simulation strategies for ultrasonic color blood flow imaging, based on a computer and experimental model of the carotid artery.
Swillens A; De Schryver T; Løvstakken L; Torp H; Segers P
Ann Biomed Eng; 2009 Nov; 37(11):2188-99. PubMed ID: 19669881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and Precision of a Plane Wave Vector Flow Imaging Method in the Healthy Carotid Artery.
Jensen J; Hoyos CAV; Traberg MS; Olesen JB; Tomov BG; Moshavegh R; Holbek S; Stuart MB; Ewertsen C; Hansen KL; Thomsen C; Nielsen MB; Jensen JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1727-1741. PubMed ID: 29735315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions.
Papathanasopoulou P; Zhao S; Köhler U; Robertson MB; Long Q; Hoskins P; Xu XY; Marshall I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 12541221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-Newtonian models for molecular viscosity and wall shear stress in a 3D reconstructed human left coronary artery.
Soulis JV; Giannoglou GD; Chatzizisis YS; Seralidou KV; Parcharidis GE; Louridas GE
Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jan; 30(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17412633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and image-based computational fluid dynamics for quantification of pulsatile flow in a carotid bifurcation phantom.
Zhao SZ; Papathanasopoulou P; Long Q; Marshall I; Xu XY
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Sep; 31(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12918911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simulation environment for validating ultrasonic blood flow and vessel wall imaging based on fluid-structure interaction simulations: ultrasonic assessment of arterial distension and wall shear rate.
Swillens A; Degroote J; Vierendeels J; Lovstakken L; Segers P
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4318-30. PubMed ID: 20879592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haemodynamic assessment of human coronary arteries is affected by degree of freedom of artery movement.
Javadzadegan A; Yong AS; Chang M; Ng MK; Behnia M; Kritharides L
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Feb; 20(3):260-272. PubMed ID: 27467730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models.
Marshall I; Zhao S; Papathanasopoulou P; Hoskins P; Xu Y
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15046997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the relative importance of rheology for image-based CFD models of the carotid bifurcation.
Lee SW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 17408332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of hemodynamics in human carotid artery using ultrasound and computational fluid dynamics.
Starmans-Kool MJ; Stanton AV; Zhao S; Xu XY; Thom SA; Hughes AD
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2002 Mar; 92(3):957-61. PubMed ID: 11842026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operator dependence of 3-D ultrasound-based computational fluid dynamics for the carotid bifurcation.
Glor FP; Ariff B; Hughes AD; Verdonck PR; Thom SA; Barratt DC; Xu XY
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Apr; 24(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 15822803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility study of 3D geometrical reconstruction of the human carotid bifurcation from magnetic resonance images.
Long Q; Ariff B; Zhao SZ; Thom SA; Hughes AD; Xu XY
Magn Reson Med; 2003 Apr; 49(4):665-74. PubMed ID: 12652537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of image-based computational fluid dynamics models of the human carotid bifurcation.
Thomas JB; Milner JS; Rutt BK; Steinman DA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 31(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 12627820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility study of magnetic resonance image-based computational fluid dynamics prediction of carotid bifurcation flow.
Glor FP; Long Q; Hughes AD; Augst AD; Ariff B; Thom SA; Verdonck PR; Xu XY
Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 31(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 12627821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A reconstruction method for gappy and noisy arterial flow data.
Yakhot A; Anor T; Karniadakis GE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(12):1681-97. PubMed ID: 18092738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D dynamical ultrasonic model of pulsating vessel walls.
Balocco S; Basset O; Courbebaisse G; Delachartre P; Tortoli P; Cachard C
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e179-83. PubMed ID: 16857232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
