These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12751428)

  • 1. Task complexity and limb selection in reaching.
    Gabbard C; Tapia M; Helbig CR
    Int J Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 113(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 12751428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 14745465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imagined and actual limb selection: a test of preference.
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 11527314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What determines limb selection for reaching?
    Helbig CR; Gabbard C
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2004 Mar; 75(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 15532361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right-handers' reaching in contralateral hemispace: a kinematic observation.
    Kim W; Gabbard C; Buchanan JJ; Ryu YU
    J Mot Behav; 2007 Nov; 39(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 18055351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateralized effects on reaching by children.
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR; Gentry V
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2001; 19(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 11411421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constraints on arm selection processes when reaching: degrees of freedom and joint amplitudes interact to influence limb selection.
    Kim W; Buchanan J; Gabbard C
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(5):403-11. PubMed ID: 21978264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Which factors affect hand selection in children's grasping in hemispace? Combined effects of task demand and motor dominance.
    Leconte P; Fagard J
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Feb; 60(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 16288823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 10843260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Under what conditions will right-handers use their left hand? The effects of object orientation, object location, arm position, and task complexity in preferential reaching.
    Bryden PJ; Huszczynski J
    Laterality; 2011 Nov; 16(6):722-36. PubMed ID: 21391107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of object spatial location and task complexity on children's use of their preferred hand depending on their handedness consistency.
    Leconte P; Fagard J
    Dev Psychobiol; 2004 Sep; 45(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 15340974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.
    Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Mar; 48(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 16489592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A developmental analysis of the relationship between hand preference and performance: I. Preferential reaching into hemispace.
    Pryde KM; Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Brain Cogn; 2000; 43(1-3):370-4. PubMed ID: 10857728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. End-state comfort trumps handedness in object manipulation.
    Coelho CJ; Studenka BE; Rosenbaum DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):718-30. PubMed ID: 24294873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation: effects of hemispace and joint coordination.
    Rand MK; Rentsch S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Dec; 235(12):3645-3661. PubMed ID: 28900673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One hand or the other? Effector selection biases in right and left handers.
    Main JC; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():300-9. PubMed ID: 25278131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Healthy adults favor stable left/right hand choices over performance at an unconstrained reach-to-grasp task.
    Kim T; Zhou R; Gassass S; Soberano T; Liu L; Philip BA
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Jun; 242(6):1349-1359. PubMed ID: 38563977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in reach-to-grasp kinematics.
    Rouse AG; Schieber MH
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Dec; 114(6):3268-82. PubMed ID: 26445870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric differences in the control of limb dynamics: a link between arm performance asymmetries and arm selection patterns.
    Coelho CJ; Przybyla A; Yadav V; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Feb; 109(3):825-38. PubMed ID: 23155169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manual asymmetries in the kinematics of a reach-to-grasp action.
    Flindall JW; Doan JB; Gonzalez CL
    Laterality; 2014; 19(4):489-507. PubMed ID: 24350797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.