These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12752541)
21. Patient-reported outcomes of maxillary implant-supported overdentures compared with conventional dentures. Zembic A; Wismeijer D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):441-50. PubMed ID: 23581398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures. Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Implant-Retained Overdenture and Conventional Complete Denture: A Survey Study to Measure Patients' Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Dental School Clinics. Kutkut A; Knudsen H; Bush H; Studts J J Oral Implantol; 2024 Jun; 50(3):266-276. PubMed ID: 38839070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction. De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Edentulous Patients with Two- vs Four-Locator-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study. Karbach J; Hartmann S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26394352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses. Heydecke G; Klemetti E; Awad MA; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 12854797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Different Attachments Used for Implant-Retained Overdentures in Subjects with Resorbed Mandibles: A Crossover Trial. Mahanna FF; Elsyad MA; Mourad SI; Abozaed HW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 32142580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of Conventional Complete Dentures and Different Attachment Types in Implant-Supported Overdentures on Quality of Life and Nutritional Status in Edentulous Geriatric Patients. Kilic K; Sayin B; Ozer FF; Akin S Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 33570514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. Allen PF; McMillan AS; Walshaw D J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Feb; 85(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11208203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient-based and clinical outcomes of implant telescopic attachment-retained mandibular overdentures: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Yunus N; Saub R; Taiyeb Ali TB; Salleh NM; Baig MR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 25216142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures. Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does a prosthodontist spend more time providing mandibular two-implant overdentures than conventional dentures? Takanashi Y; Penrod JR; Chehade A; Klemetti E; Savard A; Lund JP; Feine JS Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 12170856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of dietary advice on edentulous adults' denture satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life 6 months after intervention. Ellis JS; Elfeky AF; Moynihan PJ; Seal C; Hyland RM; Thomason M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 20105193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part III: comparisons of patient satisfaction. Kapur KK; Garrett NR; Hamada MO; Roumanas ED; Freymiller E; Han T; Diener RM; Levin S; Wong WK J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):416-27. PubMed ID: 10512960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among elderly edentulous patients: satisfaction and quality of life. Assunção WG; Zardo GG; Delben JA; Barão VA Gerodontology; 2007 Dec; 24(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 17999736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The patient general satisfaction of mandibular single-implant overdentures and conventional complete dentures: Study protocol for a randomized crossover trial. Kanazawa M; Tanoue M; Miyayasu A; Takeshita S; Sato D; Asami M; Lam TV; Thu KM; Oda K; Komagamine Y; Minakuchi S; Feine J Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 May; 97(20):e10721. PubMed ID: 29768340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]