479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12752647)
1. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal.
Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V
Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of F-File on removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study.
Tunga U; Parlak E; Bodrumlu E; Aydemir H; Yeşilsoy C
Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 21771185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Kamel WH; Kataia EM
J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Root Canal Tapering on Smear Layer Removal.
Zarei M; Javidi M; Afkhami F; Tanbakuchi B; Zadeh MM; Mohammadi MM
N Y State Dent J; 2016 Apr; 82(3):35-8. PubMed ID: 27348950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of final irrigation--a scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
Scelza MF; Antoniazzi JH; Scelza P
J Endod; 2000 Jun; 26(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 11199754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
