These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12752647)

  • 1. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal.
    Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V
    Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study.
    Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G
    J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.
    Caron G; Nham K; Bronnec F; Machtou P
    J Endod; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1361-6. PubMed ID: 20647097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and MTAD on debris and smear layer removal using a self-adjusting file.
    Adigüzel O; Yiğit-Özer S; Kaya S; Uysal İ; Ganidağli-Ayaz S; Akkuş Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 21873086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Glyde File Prep in combination with sodium hypochlorite as a root canal irrigant.
    Grandini S; Balleri P; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 12043868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation and manual dynamic irrigation on smear layer removal from root canals in a closed apex in vitro model.
    Andrabi SM; Kumar A; Zia A; Iftekhar H; Alam S; Siddiqui S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Aug; 5(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 23595996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of four different irrigation techniques combined with 60 °C 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA in smear layer removal.
    Guo X; Miao H; Li L; Zhang S; Zhou D; Lu Y; Wu L
    BMC Oral Health; 2014 Sep; 14():114. PubMed ID: 25201549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of F-File on removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study.
    Tunga U; Parlak E; Bodrumlu E; Aydemir H; Yeşilsoy C
    Aust Endod J; 2011 Aug; 37(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 21771185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A scanning electron microscopic study of debris and smear layer remaining following use of AET instruments and K-flexofiles.
    Drukteinis S; Balciuniene I
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 17191061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Kamel WH; Kataia EM
    J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of radicular dentin erosion and smear layer removal capacity of Self-Adjusting File using different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite as an initial irrigant.
    Kaya S; Yiğit-Özer S; Adigüzel Ö
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 21664155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the efficacy of maleic acid and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Ballal NV; Kandian S; Mala K; Bhat KS; Acharya S
    J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1573-6. PubMed ID: 19840650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigating solutions: a comparative scanning electron microscope evaluation.
    Ahir B; Parekh V; Katyayan MK; Katyayan PA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(5):617-22. PubMed ID: 25511062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols.
    Al-Ali M; Sathorn C; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2012 Oct; 45(10):898-906. PubMed ID: 22486845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of Root Canal Tapering on Smear Layer Removal.
    Zarei M; Javidi M; Afkhami F; Tanbakuchi B; Zadeh MM; Mohammadi MM
    N Y State Dent J; 2016 Apr; 82(3):35-8. PubMed ID: 27348950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative scanning electron microscopic investigation of the smear layer after the use of sodium hypochlorite gel and solution forms as root canal irrigants.
    Zand V; Lotfi M; Rahimi S; Mokhtari H; Kazemi A; Sakhamanesh V
    J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1234-7. PubMed ID: 20630306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of high-frequency electrical pulses on organic tissue in root canals.
    Lendini M; Alemanno E; Migliaretti G; Berutti E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):531-8. PubMed ID: 16011771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of final irrigation--a scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Scelza MF; Antoniazzi JH; Scelza P
    J Endod; 2000 Jun; 26(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 11199754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of application time of EDTA and NaOCl on intracanal smear layer removal: an SEM analysis.
    Teixeira CS; Felippe MC; Felippe WT
    Int Endod J; 2005 May; 38(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 15876291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of root canal taper on its cleanliness: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Arvaniti IS; Khabbaz MG
    J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):871-4. PubMed ID: 21787508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.