These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12753964)

  • 1. Preserved use of spatial cues for sound segregation in a case of spatial deafness.
    Thiran AB; Clarke S
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 12753964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit representation of the auditory space: contribution of the left and right hemispheres.
    Tissieres I; Crottaz-Herbette S; Clarke S
    Brain Struct Funct; 2019 May; 224(4):1569-1582. PubMed ID: 30848352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial cues alone produce inaccurate sound segregation: the effect of interaural time differences.
    Schwartz A; McDermott JH; Shinn-Cunningham B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):357-68. PubMed ID: 22779483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-acuity spatial stream segregation.
    Middlebrooks JC
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():491-9. PubMed ID: 23716256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selective deficit of auditory localisation in patients with visuospatial neglect.
    Pavani F; Làdavas E; Driver J
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 11684162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory spatial deficits following hemispheric lesions: dissociation of explicit and implicit processing.
    Duffour-Nikolov C; Tardif E; Maeder P; Thiran AB; Bloch J; Frischknecht R; Clarke S
    Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2012; 22(5):674-96. PubMed ID: 22672110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.
    Middlebrooks JC; Onsan ZA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3896-911. PubMed ID: 23231120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Lever C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2178-89. PubMed ID: 14587615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory spatial attention using interaural time differences.
    Sach AJ; Hill NI; Bailey PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):717-29. PubMed ID: 10811171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane.
    Pedley AJ; Kitterick PT
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():104-111. PubMed ID: 28666702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of externalization and spatial cues on the generation of auditory brainstem responses and middle latency responses.
    Junius D; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17270375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two types of auditory neglect.
    Bellmann A; Meuli R; Clarke S
    Brain; 2001 Apr; 124(Pt 4):676-87. PubMed ID: 11287368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of interaural time difference on head-turning behavior.
    Poganiatz I; Nelken I; Wagner H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Mar; 2(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 11545146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human cortical sensitivity to interaural time difference in high-frequency sounds.
    Salminen NH; Altoè A; Takanen M; Santala O; Pulkki V
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():99-106. PubMed ID: 25668126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.
    Higgins NC; McLaughlin SA; Rinne T; Stecker GC
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Sep; 114(36):E7602-E7611. PubMed ID: 28827357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sound localization cues of binaural hearing].
    Paulus E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2003 Apr; 82(4):240-8. PubMed ID: 12717598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disturbed sound lateralization in patients with spatial neglect.
    Zimmer U; Lewald J; Karnath HO
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jul; 15(5):694-703. PubMed ID: 12965043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial Mechanisms for Segregation of Competing Sounds, and a Breakdown in Spatial Hearing.
    Middlebrooks JC; Waters MF
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():571095. PubMed ID: 33041763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.