243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12754905)
1. Matriculating student perceptions of changes to the admissions interview process at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a prospective, controlled comparison.
Albanese MA; Snow M; Skochelak S; Huggett K; Farrell PM
WMJ; 2003; 102(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 12754905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends concerning a common medical school interview question.
Kelley SR; Ray MA
J Ky Med Assoc; 2004 Dec; 102(12):559-61. PubMed ID: 15636191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of medical students to admission interviews.
Koc T; Katona C; Rees PJ
Med Educ; 2008 Mar; 42(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 18221267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical school application interview score has limited predictive validity for performance on a fourth year clinical practice examination.
Basco WT; Lancaster CJ; Gilbert GE; Carey ME; Blue AV
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 May; 13(2):151-62. PubMed ID: 17089077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A longitudinal study of the impact of interviews on medical school admissions in Taiwan.
Fan AP; Tsai TC; Su TP; Kosik RO; Morisky DE; Chen CH; Shih WJ; Lee CH
Eval Health Prof; 2010 Jun; 33(2):140-63. PubMed ID: 20356935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends concerning a common medical school interview question, revisited.
Kelley SR; Ray MA; Tsuei BJ
Med Teach; 2007 Jun; 29(5):e139-42. PubMed ID: 17885966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A predictive validity study of medical judgment vignettes to assess students' noncognitive attributes: a 3-year prospective longitudinal study.
Donnon T; Oddone-Paolucci E; Violato C
Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):e148-55. PubMed ID: 19241216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of students from main and alternate admission lists at one school: the potential impact on student performance of increasing enrollment.
Paolo AM; Stites S; Bonaminio GA; Cox G; Zeiger L; Meyer M; McCurdy S
Acad Med; 2006 Sep; 81(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16936496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview.
Lemay JF; Lockyer JM; Collin VT; Brownell AK
Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 17518837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application submission date reflects applicant quality.
Fuhrman GM; Dada S; Ehleben C
J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 19059168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: acceptability and feasibility.
Brownell K; Lockyer J; Collin T; Lemay JF
Med Teach; 2007 May; 29(4):394-6. PubMed ID: 17786758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Academic profile of students who transferred to Zagreb School of Medicine from other medical schools in Croatia.
Dusek D; Dolovcak S; Kljaković-Gaspić M
Croat Med J; 2004 Feb; 45(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 14968454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple mini-interviews versus traditional interviews: stakeholder acceptability comparison.
Razack S; Faremo S; Drolet F; Snell L; Wiseman J; Pickering J
Med Educ; 2009 Oct; 43(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 19769649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discerning quality: using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School.
Harris S; Owen C
Med Educ; 2007 Mar; 41(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 17316207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Students versus faculty members as admissions interviewers: comparisons of ratings data and admissions decisions.
Eddins-Folensbee FF; Harris TB; Miller-Wasik M; Thompson B
Acad Med; 2012 Apr; 87(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22361799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The career aspirations and location intentions of James Cook University's first cohort of medical students: a longitudinal study at course entry and graduation.
Veitch C; Underhill A; Hays RB
Rural Remote Health; 2006; 6(1):537. PubMed ID: 16468944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The admission index in the dental school admissions process.
Staat RH; Yancey JM
J Dent Educ; 1982 Aug; 46(8):500-3. PubMed ID: 6954181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applicant selection procedures: a more objective approach to the interview process.
Vojir CP; Bronstein RA
J Allied Health; 1983 May; 12(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 6874559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of medical school admissions criteria in predicting residency ranking four years later.
Peskun C; Detsky A; Shandling M
Med Educ; 2007 Jan; 41(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17209893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical students' perceptions of emerging learning communities at one medical school.
Rosenbaum ME; Schwabbauer M; Kreiter C; Ferguson KJ
Acad Med; 2007 May; 82(5):508-15. PubMed ID: 17457076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
