These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12754918)

  • 1. [Perroca's instrument for patient classification: reliability test for evaluators agreement--correlation].
    Perroca MG; Gaidzinski RR
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2002 Sep; 36(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 12754918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessing the inter-rater reliability of an instrument for the classification of patients--Kappa's quotient].
    Perroca MG; Gaidzinski RR
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2003 Mar; 37(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 12968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perroca's patient classification instrument: construct validity analysis].
    Perroca MG; Gaidzinski RR
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2004; 12(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 15122409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The transcultural adaptation and the validity and reliability of the Turkish Version of Perroca's Patient Classification Instrument.
    Ayan G; Türkmen E
    J Nurs Manag; 2020 Mar; 28(2):259-266. PubMed ID: 31793125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classification of patients and nursing workload in intensive care: comparison between instruments.
    Ferreira PC; Machado RC; Martins QCS; Sampaio SF
    Rev Gaucha Enferm; 2017 Jun; 38(2):e62782. PubMed ID: 28678901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Validity and Reliability of a Revised Incontinence-Associated Skin Damage Severity Instrument (IASD.D.2) by 3 Groups of Nursing Staff.
    Bliss DZ; Gurvich OV; Hurlow J; Cefalu JE; Gannon A; Wilhems A; Wiltzen KR; Gannon E; Lee H; Borchert K; Trammel SH
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018; 45(5):449-455. PubMed ID: 30188393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of parameters to fill in the Perroca's patient classification system.
    Macedo ABT; Riboldi CO; Silva KSD; Mergen T; Echer IC; Souza SBC
    Rev Gaucha Enferm; 2018 Nov; 39():e20170241. PubMed ID: 30517432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and content validity of the new version of a patient classification instrument.
    Perroca MG
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2011; 19(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 21412630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation.
    Mirski MA; LeDroux SN; Lewin JJ; Thompson CB; Mirski KT; Griswold M
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Aug; 38(8):1674-84. PubMed ID: 20581667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Mixed-methods Study to Assess Interrater Reliability and Nurse Perception of the Braden Scale in a Tertiary Acute Care Setting.
    Ho CH; Cheung A; Southern D; Ocampo W; Kaufman J; Hogan DB; Baylis B; Conly JM; Stelfox HT; Ghali WA
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Dec; 62(12):30-38. PubMed ID: 28054924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment Instrument for Problem-focused Coping. Reliability test of APC. Part 1.
    Tollén A; Ahlström G
    Scand J Caring Sci; 1998; 12(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9601442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of the Sedation-Agitation Scale between nurses and doctors.
    Ryder-Lewis MC; Nelson KM
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2008 Aug; 24(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 18206372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme.
    Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 17584345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a care protocol for the septic patient in the Intensive Care Unit.
    Pedrosa KKA; Oliveira SA; Machado RC
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2018 May; 71(3):1106-1114. PubMed ID: 29924163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Home health care: reliability and validity testing of a patient-classification instrument.
    Albrecht MN
    Public Health Nurs; 1991 Jun; 8(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 1924106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a home health patient classification instrument.
    Anderson KL; Rokosky JS
    West J Nurs Res; 2001 Feb; 23(1):56-71. PubMed ID: 11216025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-observer variation in the assessment of skin ulceration.
    Buntinx F; Beckers H; De Keyser G; Flour M; Nissen G; Raskin T; De Vet H
    J Wound Care; 1996 Apr; 5(4):166-70. PubMed ID: 8826261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.