196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12755087)
1. Dealing with death.
Noonan JT
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 12755087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading the mystery passage narrowly: a legal, ethical and practical argument against physician assisted suicide.
Hickey MB
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):567-603. PubMed ID: 12755094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Give me liberty and give me death: assisted suicide as a fundamental liberty interest.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1997; 6(2):527-50. PubMed ID: 16485372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
Pratt DA
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court and physician-assisted suicide--the ultimate right.
Angell M
N Engl J Med; 1997 Jan; 336(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 8970940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted suicide issue moves to Supreme Court.
United States Catholic Conference
Origins; 1996 Dec; 26(26):421, 423-430. PubMed ID: 11660269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the right to die dead?
Samar VJ
De Paul Law Rev; 2000; 50(1):221-64. PubMed ID: 12455502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to assisted suicide in Washington and Oregon: the courts won't allow a northwest passage.
Kline RL
Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1996; 5(2):213-37. PubMed ID: 16086524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional tragedy in dying: responses to some common arguments against the constitutional right to die.
Fleming JE
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 12455518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Washington v. Glucksberg.
Coleson RE
Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9479884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted suicide: the state versus the people.
Safranek JP; Safranek SJ
Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):261-79. PubMed ID: 16086510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The quiet battle for the heart of liberty--a victory for the cautious: Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997).
Melchoir JA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):1359-86. PubMed ID: 16211745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to die.
N Y Times Web; 2005 Oct; ():A26. PubMed ID: 16231462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recent case law about the right to die].
Bascuñán R A
Rev Med Chil; 2016 Apr; 144(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 27401380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physician-assisted suicide: the Supreme Court's wary rejection.
Bourguignon HJ; Martyn SR
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2000; 31(2):253-72. PubMed ID: 12625320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US Supreme Court confronts 'right to die'.
Carolan B
Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():65-9. PubMed ID: 9717364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician-assisted suicide: three crucial distinctions.
Spritz N
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 24(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 12455517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Death with dignity in Montana.
Dallner JE; Manning DS
Mont Law Rev; 2004; 65(1):309-41. PubMed ID: 16180295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician-assisted suicide: the Hippocratic dilemma.
Bussey R
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1997; 22(2):253-80. PubMed ID: 12778912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Who decides if there is "triumph in the ultimate agony?" Constitutional theory and the emerging right to die with dignity.
Goebel BC
William Mary Law Rev; 1996; 37(2):827-901. PubMed ID: 12173637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
