These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12755156)

  • 1. Growing pains: disputes surrounding human reproductive interests stretch the boundaries of traditional legal concepts.
    Triber GA
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1998; 23(1):103-40. PubMed ID: 12755156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive capacity: what does the embryo get?
    Stephens KU
    South Univ Law Rev; 1997; 24(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 16528857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Deciding custody of frozen embryos: many eggs are frozen but who is chosen?
    Malo PE
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 1999-2000; 3():307-34. PubMed ID: 15929238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confused heritage and the absurdity of genetic ownership.
    Silver LM; Silver SR
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):593-618. PubMed ID: 12731550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cold shoulder treatment: the disposition of frozen embryos post-divorce.
    King M
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1999 Fall-2000 Spring; 25(1-2):99-137. PubMed ID: 16211741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disputing over embryos: of contracts and consents.
    Waldman EA
    Ariz State Law J; 2000; 32(3):897-940. PubMed ID: 12769122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The legal status of embryos and implications for reproductive technologies and biotechnology research.
    Bowens KK
    J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17111524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical dilemmas in reproductive medicine.
    Paine SJ; Moore PK; Hill DL
    Whittier Law Rev; 1996; 18(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 16273701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A primer on posthumous conception and related issues of assisted reproduction.
    Brenwald ML; Redeker K
    Washburn Law J; 1999; 38(2):599-654. PubMed ID: 12774811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
    Katz GA
    Harv J Law Technol; 1998; 11(3):683-98. PubMed ID: 12731553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Davis v. Davis: the applicability of privacy and property rights to the disposition of frozen preembryos in intrafamilial disputes.
    Muller RJ
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1993; 24(3):763-804. PubMed ID: 11659794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frozen embryos: towards an equitable solution.
    Trespalacios MJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 46(3):803-34. PubMed ID: 16047447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles?
    Sheinbach DM
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1999; 48(3):989-1027. PubMed ID: 12611403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted reproductive technologies: contracts, consents, and controversies.
    Elster NR
    Am J Fam Law; 2005; 18(4):193-9. PubMed ID: 17153245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro fertilization and the right to procreate: the right to no.
    Sieck WA
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1998 Dec; 147(2):435-85. PubMed ID: 16514780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Navigating the slippery slope of frozen embryo disputes: the case for a contractual approach.
    Fleming NA
    Temple Law Rev; 2002; 75(2):345-74. PubMed ID: 15156893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sperm, egg, and a petri dish. Unveiling the underlying property issues surrounding cryopreserved embryos.
    Langley LS; Blackston JW
    J Leg Med; 2006 Jun; 27(2):167-206. PubMed ID: 16728352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The legal dimensions of in vitro fertilization: cryopreserved embryos frozen in legal limbo.
    Cuva AJ
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1991; 8(part 2):383-414. PubMed ID: 16144101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reconciling property law with advances in reproductive science.
    Brown B
    Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1995; 6(2):73-88. PubMed ID: 11655141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disposition of cryopreserved preembryos after divorce.
    Windsor KH
    Iowa Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 88(4):1001-34. PubMed ID: 15214352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.