These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12755242)

  • 1. Induction of labour using low and high dose regimens of prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets.
    Bahar AM; Archibong EI; Zaki ZM; Mahfouz AA
    East Afr Med J; 2003 Jan; 80(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12755242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial.
    Taher SE; Inder JW; Soltan SA; Eliahoo J; Edmonds DK; Bennett PR
    BJOG; 2011 May; 118(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 21429067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
    Sobande AA; Al-Bar HM; Archibong EI
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: 1. Clinical outcome.
    MacKenzie IZ; Burns E
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Sep; 104(9):1062-7. PubMed ID: 9307536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
    Kelly AJ; Kavanagh J; Thomas J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD003101. PubMed ID: 11406078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
    Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Induction of labour with vaginal prostaglandin tablet vs gel.
    Khan ZA; Abdul B; Majoko F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Aug; 31(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 21823846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following additional doses of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour: a retrospective cohort study.
    Ayaz H; Black M; Madhuvrata P; Shetty A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Oct; 170(2):364-7. PubMed ID: 23932182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induced labour with prostaglandin E2 in different parity groups after premature rupture of membranes.
    Sobande AA; Albar HM
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003 May; 9(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 15751923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
    Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
    Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
    Shetty A; Livingston I; Acharya S; Templeton A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical predictive factors for vaginal delivery following induction of labour among pregnant women in Jordan.
    Obeidat RA; Almaaitah M; Ben-Sadon A; Istaiti D; Rawashdeh H; Hamadneh S; Hammouri H; Bataineh A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Oct; 21(1):685. PubMed ID: 34620120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety of low-dose prostaglandin E2 induction in grandmultiparous women with previous cesarean delivery.
    Haas J; Barzilay E; Chayen B; Lebovitz O; Yinon Y; Mazaki-Tovi S; Harel L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Mar; 27(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 23841832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.
    Shetty A; Livingstone I; Acharya S; Rice P; Danielian P; Templeton A
    BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 15104606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.