130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12755536)
1. Evaluation of simethicone-coated cellulose as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.
Sahani DV; Jhaveri KS; D'souza RV; Varghese JC; Halpern E; Harisinghani MG; Hahn PF; Saini S
Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 12755536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 2 oral ultrasonography contrast agents: simethicone-coated cellulose and simethicone-water rotation in improving pancreatic visualization.
Ishigami K; Abu-Yousef DM; Kao SC; Abu-Yousef MM
Ultrasound Q; 2014 Jun; 30(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 24850028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of simethicone coated cellulose (SonoRx) as a negative oral contrast agent for abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Saini S; Jhaveri KS; Sahani DV; Varghese JC; Hahn PF
Acad Radiol; 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2():S357-8. PubMed ID: 12188274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Normal enhancement of the small bowel: evaluation with spiral CT.
Horton KM; Eng J; Fishman EK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 10667662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of a decision-analytic model to support the use of a new oral US contrast agent in patients with abdominal pain.
Bree RL; Arnold RJ; Pettit KG; Kaniecki DJ; O'haeri C; LaFrance ND; Toaff AL
Acad Radiol; 2001 Mar; 8(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 11249087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small-bowel diseases: prospective evaluation of multi-detector row helical CT enteroclysis in 107 consecutive patients.
Boudiaf M; Jaff A; Soyer P; Bouhnik Y; Hamzi L; Rymer R
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 15459329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upper gastrointestinal tract and abdomen: water as an orally administered contrast agent for helical CT.
Winter TC; Ager JD; Nghiem HV; Hill RS; Harrison SD; Freeny PC
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 8888224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of cellulose concentration on the efficacy of a cellulose-based oral contrast agent for gastrointestinal ultrasonography.
Sisler WJ; Tilcock C
J Ultrasound Med; 1995 Apr; 14(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 7602683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
Matsuoka Y; Masumoto T; Koga H; Suzuki K; Ushimi T; Terada H; Tamura A; Yokoyama Y; Abe K; Kamata N
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved retroperitoneal and gastrointestinal sonography using oral contrast agents in a porcine model.
Muradali D; Burns PN; Pron G; Hope-Simpson D; Wilson S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Aug; 171(2):475-81. PubMed ID: 9694479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of a new oral contrast agent for sonography: a phase II trial.
Lev-Toaff AS; Langer JE; Rubin DL; Zelch JV; Chong WK; Barone AE; Goldberg BB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 10430149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-detector row CT of the small bowel: peak enhancement temporal window--initial experience.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; DeLong DM; Jaffe TA; Merkle EM; Paulson EK; Thomas J
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 17384239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography.
Lim BK; Bux SI; Rahmat K; Lam SY; Liew YW
Singapore Med J; 2012 Nov; 53(11):732-6. PubMed ID: 23192500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Otero HJ; Yap JT; Patak MA; Erturk SM; Israel DA; Johnston CJ; Sakellis C; Rybicki FJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Ros PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.
Awai K; Inoue M; Yagyu Y; Watanabe M; Sano T; Nin S; Koike R; Nishimura Y; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral contrast solution and computed tomography for blunt abdominal trauma: a randomized study.
Stafford RE; McGonigal MD; Weigelt JA; Johnson TJ
Arch Surg; 1999 Jun; 134(6):622-6; discussion 626-7. PubMed ID: 10367871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
