These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12756516)

  • 1. Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 151(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 12756516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The spatial distribution of attentional selectivity in touch: evidence from somatosensory ERP components.
    Eimer M; Forster B
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 114(7):1298-306. PubMed ID: 12842729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transient inhibition of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex disrupts attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1928-37. PubMed ID: 21439987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acute aerobic exercise enhances attentional modulation of somatosensory event-related potentials during a tactile discrimination task.
    Popovich C; Staines WR
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 281():267-75. PubMed ID: 25549856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ERP correlates of tactile spatial attention differ under intra- and intermodal conditions.
    Forster B; Sambo CF; Pavone EF
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 19665517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2303-16. PubMed ID: 22683449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent effects of eye gaze and spatial attention on the processing of tactile events: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Gherri E; Forster B
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():239-47. PubMed ID: 26101088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial attention related SEP amplitude modulations covary with BOLD signal in S1--a simultaneous EEG--fMRI study.
    Schubert R; Ritter P; Wüstenberg T; Preuschhof C; Curio G; Sommer W; Villringer A
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Nov; 18(11):2686-700. PubMed ID: 18372293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind.
    Forster B; Eardley AF; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2007 Feb; 1131(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 17173872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention.
    Eimer M; Forster B; Fieger A; Harbich S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):596-608. PubMed ID: 15036056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional modulation of the human somatosensory evoked potential in a trial-by-trial spatial cueing and sustained spatial attention task measured with high density 128 channels EEG.
    Zopf R; Giabbiconi CM; Gruber T; Müller MM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):491-509. PubMed ID: 15268926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch.
    Forster B; Gillmeister H
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):788-96. PubMed ID: 20958307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal interactions between audition, touch, and vision in endogenous spatial attention: ERP evidence on preparatory states and sensory modulations.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):254-71. PubMed ID: 11970790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-guided spatial attention in touch: holding the same object with both hands delays attentional selection.
    Gillmeister H; Adler J; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 May; 22(5):931-42. PubMed ID: 19413480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch.
    Sambo CF; Gillmeister H; Forster B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19519638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An event-related brain potential study of cross-modal links in spatial attention between vision and touch.
    Eimer M; Driver J
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 11037046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.
    Bolton DA; Staines WR
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1502-13. PubMed ID: 22406692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits.
    Forster B; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Mar; 42(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 15787854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reflexive attention in touch: an investigation of event related potentials and behavioural responses.
    Jones A; Forster B
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):313-22. PubMed ID: 22142773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.