These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12757104)

  • 1. Graphic representation of data resulting from measurement comparison trials in cataract and refractive surgery.
    Krummenauer F; Storkebaum K; Dick HB
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 12757104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [II: Difference plots or scattergram--when to use which?].
    Krummenauer F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):682-5. PubMed ID: 12410470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of axial length measurement of the eye using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound in cases of macular disease.
    Kojima T; Tamaoki A; Yoshida N; Kaga T; Suto C; Ichikawa K
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Sep; 117(9):1750-4. PubMed ID: 20471687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry.
    Hitzenberger CK; Drexler W; Dolezal C; Skorpik F; Juchem M; Fercher AF; Gnad HD
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 May; 34(6):1886-93. PubMed ID: 8491541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of ultrasound and optic biometry with respect to ocular refraction after cataract surgery].
    Skorkovská S; Michálek J; Ruberová M; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 15011303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.
    Montés-Micó R; Carones F; Buttacchio A; Ferrer-Blasco T; Madrid-Costa D
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Sep; 27(9):665-71. PubMed ID: 21323302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients.
    Goebels S; Pattmöller M; Eppig T; Cayless A; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2387-93. PubMed ID: 26703487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the accuracy of Canon KU-1 IOL measurer and VPLUS A/B scanner in axial length measurement.
    Chen C; Lin Z; Feng B; Li Y
    Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2003 Sep; 19(3):150-2, 183. PubMed ID: 14574969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the signal-to-noise ratio on the accuracy of IOLMaster measurements.
    Suto C; Sato C; Shimamura E; Toshida H; Ichikawa K; Hori S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Dec; 33(12):2062-6. PubMed ID: 18053905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of refractive outcome using intraoperative biometry and partial coherence interferometry in silicone oil-filled eyes.
    El-Baha SM; Hemeida TS
    Retina; 2009 Jan; 29(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18695632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of cataract severity on measurement acquisition with the IOLMaster.
    Freeman G; Pesudovs K
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Aug; 83(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 16029267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New Zealand cataract and refractive surgery survey 2004.
    Elder M; Leaming D; Hoy B
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 34(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 16872334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability and validity of the partial coherence interferometry for measurement of ocular axial length in children.
    Hussin HM; Spry PG; Majid MA; Gouws P
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Sep; 20(9):1021-4. PubMed ID: 16096655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study.
    Raymond S; Favilla I; Santamaria L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2547-52. PubMed ID: 19168907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster.
    Olsen T; Thorwest M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jul; 31(7):1345-50. PubMed ID: 16105605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Axial length decrease accompanying successful glaucoma filtration surgery.
    Cashwell LF; Martin CA
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Dec; 106(12):2307-11. PubMed ID: 10599662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Partial coherent interferometry--an alternative method for intraocular lens power calculation performed by ultrasonography].
    Wylegała E; Ludyga A
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 15515318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Highly precise eye length measurements in children aged 3 through 12 years.
    Quinn GE; Francis EL; Nipper KS; Flitcroft DI; Ying GS; Rees RC; Schmid GF; Maguire MG; Stone RA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 121(7):985-90. PubMed ID: 12860802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.