278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12757679)
1. Evaluation of low ligation and high ligation procedures of varicocele.
Khan M; Khan S; Pervez A; Nawaz H; Ahmed S; Tareen S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 May; 13(5):280-3. PubMed ID: 12757679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Varicocelectomy in adolescent boys: long-term experience with the Palomo procedure.
Feber KM; Kass EJ
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1657-9; discussion 1659-60. PubMed ID: 18708215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.
Ramasamy R; Schlegel PN
Urology; 2006 Dec; 68(6):1323-6. PubMed ID: 17169654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results and complications of adolescent varicocele repair with intraoperative sodium morrhuate sclerotherapy.
Lebed B; Packer M; Husmann D; Zaontz M
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1837-41. PubMed ID: 18721963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.
Al-Kandari AM; Shabaan H; Ibrahim HM; Elshebiny YH; Shokeir AA
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 17382134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adolescent varicocele repair: long-term results and comparison of surgical techniques according to optical magnification use in 100 cases at a single university hospital.
Cayan S; Acar D; Ulger S; Akbay E
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):2003-6; discussion 2006-7. PubMed ID: 16217378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches.
Al-Said S; Al-Naimi A; Al-Ansari A; Younis N; Shamsodini A; A-sadiq K; Shokeir AA
J Urol; 2008 Jul; 180(1):266-70. PubMed ID: 18499176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the role of varicocelectomy including external spermatic vein ligation in patients with scrotal pain.
Karademir K; Senkul T; Baykal K; Ateş F; Işeri C; Erden D
Int J Urol; 2005 May; 12(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 15948749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative analysis of three different surgical approaches to varicocelectomy].
Chen XF; Zhou LX; Liu YD; Ping P; Chen YH; Cao M; Sun J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 May; 15(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 19514552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimizing the outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy using isosulfan blue: a prospective randomized trial.
Schwentner C; Oswald J; Lunacek A; Deibl M; Bartsch G; Radmayr C
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):1049-52. PubMed ID: 16469616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sub-inguinal interruption of dilated veins in adolescent varicocele: should it be considered a gold standard technique?
Cimador M; Castagnetti M; Ajovalasit V; Libri M; Bertozzi M; De Grazia E
Minerva Pediatr; 2003 Dec; 55(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 14676731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lymphatic preservation using methylene blue dye during laparoscopic varicocelectomy: early results.
Rabah DM; Adwan AA; Seida MA
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4826-30. PubMed ID: 19796458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome.
Ghanem H; Anis T; El-Nashar A; Shamloul R
Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15533495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Recurrences, testicular growth and semen parameters after laparoscopic Palomo varicocelectomy].
Agnifili A; Schietroma M; Carlei F; De Berardis B; Pescosolido A; Giuliani A; Venturoni A; Amicucci G
Chir Ital; 2008; 60(4):549-54. PubMed ID: 18837256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Laparoscopic varicocele ligation. The comparative assessment of artery-ligating and artery-preserving varicocelectomy].
Huk J; Fryczkowski M; Bihun M; Połać R
Wiad Lek; 2001; 54(11-12):621-31. PubMed ID: 11928549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain.
Peterson AC; Lance RS; Ruiz HE
J Urol; 1998 May; 159(5):1565-7. PubMed ID: 9554356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing the operative treatment of boys with varicocele: sequential comparison of 4 techniques.
Riccabona M; Oswald J; Koen M; Lusuardi L; Radmayr C; Bartsch G
J Urol; 2003 Feb; 169(2):666-8. PubMed ID: 12544340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for isolated asthenospermia.
Boman JM; Libman J; Zini A
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2129-32. PubMed ID: 18804226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic varicocele ligation: are there advantages compared with the microscopic subinguinal approach?
McManus MC; Barqawi A; Meacham RB; Furness PD; Koyle MA
Urology; 2004 Aug; 64(2):357-60; discussion 360-1. PubMed ID: 15302494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of age and grade on surgery for patients with varicocele.
Ishikawa T; Fujisawa M
Urology; 2005 Apr; 65(4):768-72. PubMed ID: 15833525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
