These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1275853)

  • 1. Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli.
    Snyder E; Hillyard SA
    Behav Biol; 1976 Mar; 16(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 1275853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mechanisms of generation of mismatch negativity and their role in discrimination of short acoustical stimuli].
    Aleksandrov AA; Babanin ME; Stankevich LN
    Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova; 2002 Jul; 88(7):809-16. PubMed ID: 12238348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective attention and evoked potentials in humans--a critical review.
    Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 1975 May; 2(4):237-307. PubMed ID: 1156626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.
    Li B; Parmentier FB; Zhang M
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 23628699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanisms of generation of mismatch negativity and their role in the recognition of brief auditory stimuli.
    Aleksandrov AA; Babanin ME; Stankevich LN
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2003 Nov; 33(9):867-72. PubMed ID: 14969424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of visual attention on the intensity of auditory evoked potentials.
    Oatman LC
    Exp Neurol; 1976 Apr; 51(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1261642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modulation of mismatch negativity by stimulus deviance and modality of attention.
    Müller BW; Achenbach C; Oades RD; Bender S; Schall U
    Neuroreport; 2002 Jul; 13(10):1317-20. PubMed ID: 12151795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological measures of attentional processes in man as related to the study of schizophrenia.
    Hink RF; Hillyard SA
    J Psychiatr Res; 1978; 14(1-4):155-65. PubMed ID: 722622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials to irrelevant deviant motion of visual shapes.
    Csibra G; Czigler I
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Aug; 11(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 1748590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To switch or not to switch: brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features.
    Hölig C; Berti S
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1345():164-75. PubMed ID: 20580694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention and the auditory vertex potential. I. Effects of stimulus delivery rate.
    Schwent VL; Hillyard SA; Galambos R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1976 Jun; 40(6):604-14. PubMed ID: 57046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked response correlate of symbol and significate.
    Grastyán E; John ER; Bartlett F
    Science; 1978 Jul; 201(4351):169-71. PubMed ID: 663648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The duality of selection: excitatory and inhibitory processes in auditory selective attention.
    Melara RD; Rao A; Tong Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):279-306. PubMed ID: 11999855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attention-dependent allocation of auditory processing resources as measured by mismatch negativity.
    Dittmann-Balcar A; Thienel R; Schall U
    Neuroreport; 1999 Dec; 10(18):3749-53. PubMed ID: 10716203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attentional contexts.
    Bendixen A; Schröger E
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):231-41. PubMed ID: 18439740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related brain potentials and selective attention to acoustic and phonetic cues.
    Hink RF; Hillyard SA; Benson PJ
    Biol Psychol; 1978 Jan; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 623855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.