These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1275859)

  • 1. The significance of random sample size in flow-through photometric prescreening in cervical cytology.
    Sprenger E; Schaden M; Wagner D; Sandritter W
    Beitr Pathol; 1976 Apr; 157(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 1275859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods for cervical cytopathology.
    Tobias AHG; Vitalino AC; Rezende MT; Oliveira RRR; Coura-Vital W; Amaral RG; Carneiro CM
    Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):428-435. PubMed ID: 29904955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Research on the effectiveness of gynecological prescreening (author's transl)].
    Herzog RE
    Arch Gynakol; 1975; 218(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 1094975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears: A study using rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods.
    Tavares SB; Alves de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; Pinheiro de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 21954191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Routine use of flow-through photometric prescreening in the detection of cervical carcinoma.
    Sprenger E; Sandritter W; Naujoks H; Hilgarth M; Wagner D; Vogt-Schaden M
    Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 268126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma by means of jet wash and DNA flow-through cytophotometry.
    Sprenger E; Hilgarth M; Vogt-Schaden M
    Pathol Res Pract; 1978 Jul; 162(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 683901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-visual prescreening of cervical smears with a flow-through cytophotometer.
    Freni SC
    Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 1058617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative cytology of the positive region in flow sorted vaginal smears.
    Goerttler K; Stöhr M
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):567-72. PubMed ID: 374622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of DNA flow-through fluorescence cytophotometry for the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma.
    Sprenger E; Michaelis WE; Vogt-Schaden M; Otto C
    Beitr Pathol; 1976 Dec; 159(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 1016200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multidimensional slit-scan prescreening system: preliminary results of a single blind clinical study.
    Wheeless LL; Patten SF; Berkan TK; Brooks CL; Gorman KM; Lesh SR; Lopez PA; Wood JC
    Cytometry; 1984 Jan; 5(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6697819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metaanalysis of the accuracy of rapid prescreening relative to full screening of pap smears.
    Arbyn M; Schenck U; Ellison E; Hanselaar A
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12589640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal characteristics of laboratory screening errors in cervical cytology.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):492-8. PubMed ID: 17017433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trials with the cerviscan experimental prescreening device on polylysine-prepared slides.
    Tucker JH; Husain OA
    Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 7020514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow cytometric prescreening of cervical smears.
    Linden WA; Ochlich K; Baisch H; Scholz KU; Mauss HJ; Stegner HE; Joshi DS; Wu CT; Koprowska I; Nicolini C
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):529-35. PubMed ID: 86573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The false negative rate in cervical cytology. Comparison of monolayers to conventional smears.
    Sprenger E; Schwarzmann P; Kirkpatrick M; Fox W; Heinzerling RH; Geyer JW; Knesel EA
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 8604579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smear and SurePath liquid-based cytology in the Copenhagen population screening programme for cervical cancer.
    Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
    Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):187-94. PubMed ID: 16879266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BioPEPR: a system for the automatic prescreening of cervical smears.
    Zahniser DJ; Oud PS; Raaijmakers MC; Vooys GP; Van de Walle RT
    J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):635-41. PubMed ID: 86581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pap smears with glandular cell abnormalities: Are they detected by rapid prescreening?
    Kanber Y; Charbonneau M; Auger M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 123(12):739-44. PubMed ID: 26348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid prescreening is as effective at reducing screening error as postscreening with the FocalPoint automated screening device.
    Wilgenbusch H; Mueller G; Neal M; Renshaw AA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Nov; 39(11):818-21. PubMed ID: 20949451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.