These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12759326)

  • 21. Bias in randomised factorial trials.
    Kahan BC
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4540-9. PubMed ID: 23733397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reporting Time Horizons in Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.
    Mowakket S; Karpinski M; Gallo L; Gallo M; Banfield L; Murphy J; Waltho D; Copeland A; Moltaji S; Thoma A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):947e-957e. PubMed ID: 30212421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Factorial trials in cardiology: pros and cons.
    Lubsen J; Pocock SJ
    Eur Heart J; 1994 May; 15(5):585-8. PubMed ID: 8055995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incomplete factorial designs for randomized clinical trials.
    Byar DP; Herzberg AM; Tan WY
    Stat Med; 1993 Sep; 12(17):1629-41. PubMed ID: 8235181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Editorial: Randomised controlled trials of factorial design alias on how to speed up research on effectiveness of interventions without compromising its validity.
    Esposito M; Nieri M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 27022633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementing Clinical Research Using Factorial Designs: A Primer.
    Baker TB; Smith SS; Bolt DM; Loh WY; Mermelstein R; Fiore MC; Piper ME; Collins LM
    Behav Ther; 2017 Jul; 48(4):567-580. PubMed ID: 28577591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Monitoring futility in a two-by-two factorial design: the SPS3 experience.
    McClure LA; Coffey CS; Howard G
    Clin Trials; 2013 Apr; 10(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 23378483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interpretation of interaction in factorial analysis of variance design.
    Ottenbacher KJ
    Stat Med; 1991 Oct; 10(10):1565-71. PubMed ID: 1947512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical trials: planning and analysis.
    Farewell VT; Cook RJ
    Endocr Dev; 2010; 18():1-22. PubMed ID: 20523014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Factorial experiments: efficient tools for evaluation of intervention components.
    Collins LM; Dziak JJ; Kugler KC; Trail JB
    Am J Prev Med; 2014 Oct; 47(4):498-504. PubMed ID: 25092122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factorial designs in clinical trials: the effects of non-compliance and subadditivity.
    Brittain E; Wittes J
    Stat Med; 1989 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 2704898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A statistical primer on subgroup analyses.
    Milojevic M; Nikolic A; Jüni P; Head SJ
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):839-845. PubMed ID: 32215640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. It Is Time to Reconsider Factorial Designs: How Bradford Hill and R. A. Fisher Shaped the Standard of Clinical Evidence.
    Neuhauser D; Provost SM; Provost LP
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2020; 29(2):109-122. PubMed ID: 32224795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparisons of treatment means when factors do not interact in two-factorial studies.
    Wei J; Carroll RJ; Harden KK; Wu G
    Amino Acids; 2012 May; 42(5):2031-5. PubMed ID: 21547361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Two-level factorial experiments.
    Smucker B; Krzywinski M; Altman N
    Nat Methods; 2019 Mar; 16(3):211-212. PubMed ID: 30814708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two-by-Two Factorial Design.
    Haerling Adamson K; Prion S
    Clin Simul Nurs; 2020 Dec; 49():90-91. PubMed ID: 33024457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpretation of interaction in factorial analysis of variance design.
    Janosky JE
    Stat Med; 1992 Jul; 11(10):1403. PubMed ID: 1519000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Identifying suboptimalities with factorial model comparison.
    Ma WJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2018 Jan; 41():e234. PubMed ID: 30767822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Missed Opportunities in Clinical Psychology: What About Running Factorial Design Internet Trials and Using Other Outcomes Than Self-Report?
    Andersson G
    Clin Psychol Eur; 2023 Jun; 5(2):e12063. PubMed ID: 37732154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Systematic investigation of scaled factorial cumulant moments for nucleus-nucleus interactions.
    Adamovich MI; Aggarwal MM; Alexandrov YA; Andreeva NP; Anson ZV; Arora R; Avetyan FA; Badyal SK; Basova E; Bazarov IK; Bhalla KB; Bhasin A; Bhatia VS; Bogdanov VG; Bubnov VI; Burnett TH; Cai X; Carshiev DA; Chasnicov IY; Chernova LP; Chernyavski MM; Eligbaeva GZ; Eremenko LE; Gaitinov AS; Ganssauge ER; Garpman S; Gerassimov SG; Grote JG; Gulamov KG; Gupta SK; Gupta VK; Heckman HH; Huang H; Jacobsson B; Judek B; Kachroo S; Kalyachkina GS; Kanygina EK; Karabova M; Kharlamov SP; Kitroo S; Koss T; Krasnov SA; Kumar V; Lal P; Larionova VG; Lepetan VN; Liu LS; Lokanathan S; Lord JJ; Lukicheva NS; Luo SB; Mangotra LK; Marutyan NA; Maslennikova NV; Mittra IS; Mookerjee S; Nasyrov SZ; Navotny VS; Nystrand J; Orlova GI; Otterlund I; Palsania H; Peresadko NG
    Phys Rev D Part Fields; 1993 May; 47(9):3726-3732. PubMed ID: 10015996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.