177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12760112)
1. The judicial dismantling of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Gostin LO
Hastings Cent Rep; 2003; 33(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 12760112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Americans with Disabilities Act: disabled by court decisions.
Coelho T
Neurology; 2007 May; 68(20):1733-6. PubMed ID: 17502557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Congress seeks to restore protection with the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
Vierling LE
Prof Case Manag; 2009; 14(5):265-7. PubMed ID: 19820639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. US: Supreme Court adopts narrow definition of "disability" under anti-discrimination law.
Elliott R
Can HIV AIDS Policy Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 6(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 14979273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bragdon v. Abbott: extending the Americans with Disability Act to asymptomatic individuals.
Liu E
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):382-408. PubMed ID: 15015486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bragdon v. Abbott: the Americans with Disabilities Act and HIV infection.
Tessman I
N Engl J Med; 1999 Apr; 340(15):1212-3; author reply 1213-4. PubMed ID: 10206849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Americans with Disabilities Act: shattered aspirations and new hope.
Thomas VL; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2009 Jan; 301(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 19126814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court's influence on medicine and health: the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2005.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 2005 Oct; 294(13):1685-7. PubMed ID: 16204668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court clarifies scope of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
J Med Pract Manage; 1999; 15(3):143-4. PubMed ID: 10725047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Americans with Disabilities Act: implications of Supreme Court decisions for case managers.
Vierling L
Case Manager; 2000; 11(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11935569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. U.S. Supreme Court rules that Americans With Disabilities Act covers asymptomatic HIV infection.
Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Aug; 49(8):1108-9. PubMed ID: 9712225
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. HIV, the ADA, and the duty to treat.
Shepherd L
Houst Law Rev; 2000; 37(4):1055-100. PubMed ID: 12071219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bragdon v. Abbott, asymptomatic genetic conditions, and antidiscrimination law: a conservative perspective.
Clegg R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):409-29. PubMed ID: 15015487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The definition of disability: perspective of the disability community.
Kaplan D
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):352-64. PubMed ID: 15015484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic discrimination: why Bragdon does not ensure protection.
Rothstein LF
J Health Care Law Policy; 2000; 3(2):330-51. PubMed ID: 15015483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New rights for the disabled. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Kaminshine SJ
AAOHN J; 1991 May; 39(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 1827264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Americans with Disabilities Act: the crumbling of another wall.
Gonzalez EG; Gordon DM
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 71(12):951. PubMed ID: 2146940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AIDS law: Supreme Court declares that Americans with Disabilities Act protects people with HIV.
Newsline People AIDS Coalit N Y; 1998; ():46. PubMed ID: 11367482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Here's a look at status of court rulings on ADA. First key decision involved HIV-infected person.
AIDS Alert; 2001 Feb; 16(2):18, 23-4. PubMed ID: 15446222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HIV is a disability: court protects HIV-positive people.
Engle L
Body Posit; 1998 Jul; 11(7):32-3. PubMed ID: 11365615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
