174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12760158)
1. Mammographic computer-aided detection systems.
Health Devices; 2003 Apr; 32(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 12760158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. GPCALMA: implementation in Italian hospitals of a computer aided detection system for breast lesions by mammography examination.
Lauria A
Phys Med; 2009 Jun; 25(2):58-72. PubMed ID: 18602854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening.
Thurfjell E; Thurfjell MG; Egge E; Bjurstam N
Acta Radiol; 1998 Jul; 39(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 9685824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues.
Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial.
Brem RF; Baum J; Lechner M; Kaplan S; Souders S; Naul LG; Hoffmeister J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 12933460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-based detection and prompting of mammographic abnormalities.
Astley SM
Br J Radiol; 2004; 77 Spec No 2():S194-200. PubMed ID: 15677361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two software versions of a commercially available computer-aided detection (CAD) system for detecting breast cancer.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Kim SY; Chang JM; Kim SM; Cho N
Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 20429765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography.
Georgian-Smith D; Moore RH; Halpern E; Yeh ED; Rafferty EA; D'Alessandro HA; Staffa M; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; Kopans DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1135-41. PubMed ID: 17954651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
Astley SM
Acad Radiol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1139-43. PubMed ID: 15530806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.
Karssemeijer N; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Groenewoud JH; de Koning HJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R
Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):192-200. PubMed ID: 12616008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
