These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12760210)

  • 21. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Micera S; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 4():3. PubMed ID: 17309790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke.
    Fasoli SE; Krebs HI; Stein J; Frontera WR; Hogan N
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 84(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 12690583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of robotic rehabilitation in children with acquired or congenital movement disorders.
    Frascarelli F; Masia L; Di Rosa G; Cappa P; Petrarca M; Castelli E; Krebs HI
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Mar; 45(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 19293759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do all sub acute stroke patients benefit from robot-assisted therapy? A retrospective study.
    Duret C; Hutin E; Lehenaff L; Gracies JM
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 25420902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robotic arm skate for stroke rehabilitation.
    Wong CK; Jordan K; King M
    IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2011; 2011():5975389. PubMed ID: 22275593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke.
    Stein J; Narendran K; McBean J; Krebs K; Hughes R
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 86(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 17413538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective.
    Gassert R; Dietz V
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 29866106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice.
    Fasoli SE; Krebs HI; Hogan N
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2004; 11(4):11-9. PubMed ID: 15592986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
    Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists.
    Lu EC; Wang RH; Hebert D; Boger J; Galea MP; Mihailidis A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2011; 6(5):420-31. PubMed ID: 21184626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robot-assisted exercise for hand weakness after stroke: a pilot study.
    Stein J; Bishop L; Gillen G; Helbok R
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Nov; 90(11):887-94. PubMed ID: 21952215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A damper driven robotic end-point manipulator for functional rehabilitation exercises after stroke.
    Westerveld AJ; Aalderink BJ; Hagedoorn W; Buijze M; Schouten AC; Kooij Hv
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Oct; 61(10):2646-54. PubMed ID: 24860023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience.
    Burgar CG; Lum PS; Shor PC; Machiel Van der Loos HF
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(6):663-73. PubMed ID: 11321002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does?
    Kahn LE; Lum PS; Rymer WZ; Reinkensmeyer DJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2006; 43(5):619-30. PubMed ID: 17123203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. RUPERT closed loop control design.
    Balasubramanian S; Wei R; He J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3467-70. PubMed ID: 19163455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Arm rehabilitation : Current concepts and therapeutic options].
    Platz T; Schmuck L
    Nervenarzt; 2016 Oct; 87(10):1057-1061. PubMed ID: 27531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Upper-limb kinematic reconstruction during stroke robot-aided therapy.
    Papaleo E; Zollo L; Garcia-Aracil N; Badesa FJ; Morales R; Mazzoleni S; Sterzi S; Guglielmelli E
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Sep; 53(9):815-28. PubMed ID: 25861746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide.
    Reinkensmeyer DJ; Kahn LE; Averbuch M; McKenna-Cole A; Schmit BD; Rymer WZ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(6):653-62. PubMed ID: 11321001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [ARMOR: an electromechanical robot for upper limb training following stroke. A prospective randomised controlled pilot study].
    Mayr A; Kofler M; Saltuari L
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2008 Feb; 40(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 18322901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bio cooperative robotic platform for motor function recovery of the upper limb after stroke.
    Rodriguez Guerrero C; Fraile Marinero J; Perez Turiel J; Rivera Farina P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():4472-5. PubMed ID: 21095774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.