These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12760453)

  • 1. An illustrative study of the role of tomograms for the placement of dental implants.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Nasr HF
    J Oral Implantol; 2003; 29(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 12760453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normal anatomy on tomograms for dental implants.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 15055685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique.
    Leblebicioglu B; Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Tosun T; Gokdeniz H
    J Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 15857072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. De novo bone induction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
    Boyne PJ; Lilly LC; Marx RE; Moy PK; Nevins M; Spagnoli DB; Triplett RG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 63(12):1693-707. PubMed ID: 16297689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sinus lift procedure of the maxilla in patients with inadequate bone for dental implants: radiographic appearance.
    Abrahams JJ; Hayt MW; Rock R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 May; 174(5):1289-92. PubMed ID: 10789779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A; Pai KM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant placement immediately after the lateral approach of the trap door window procedure to create a maxillary sinus lift without bone grafting: a 2-year retrospective evaluation of 47 implants in 33 patients.
    Chen TW; Chang HS; Leung KW; Lai YL; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2324-8. PubMed ID: 17954333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H; Moses O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restricting preoperative diagnosis to two-dimensional images in oral implantology can potentially cause implant failures.
    Almog DM
    Alpha Omegan; 2010 Dec; 103(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 21313964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of dental CT imaging in dental implantology.
    Bernaerts A; Vanhoenacker FM; Chapelle K; Hintjens J; Parizel PM
    JBR-BTR; 2006; 89(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 16607875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants.
    Parnia F; Fard EM; Mahboub F; Hafezeqoran A; Gavgani FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e32-6. PubMed ID: 20123366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective study of implants placed in augmented sinuses with minimal and moderate residual crestal bone: results after 1 to 5 years.
    Urban IA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1203-12. PubMed ID: 21197499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site.
    Dawood A; Brown J; Sauret-Jackson V; Purkayastha S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Jan; 41(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 22184628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of osteotomes for sinus augmentation at the time of implant placement.
    Horowitz RA
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 May; 18(5):441-7, 450-2; quiz 454. PubMed ID: 9533357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiological findings of the post-sinus lift maxillary sinus: a computerized tomography follow-up.
    Peleg M; Chaushu G; Mazor Z; Ardekian L; Bakoon M
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1564-73. PubMed ID: 10632532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height.
    Peleg M; Mazor Z; Garg AK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 10453671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.