These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12760623)
1. Failures of retrieval and comparison constrain change detection in natural scenes. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):388-403. PubMed ID: 12760623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The fate of object memory traces under change detection and change blindness. Busch NA Brain Res; 2013 Jul; 1520():107-15. PubMed ID: 23685191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object. Yang CT; Yeh YY Psychol Res; 2009 Jan; 73(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 18231809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can blindness to response-compatible stimuli be observed in the absence of a response? Stevanovski B; Oriet C; Jolicoeur P J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 12760626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Hollingworth A; Williams CC; Henderson JM Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Dec; 8(4):761-8. PubMed ID: 11848597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Change deafness: the inability to detect changes between two voices. Vitevitch MS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):333-42. PubMed ID: 12760619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-level visual saliency does not predict change detection in natural scenes. Stirk JA; Underwood G J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):3.1-10. PubMed ID: 17997672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Guidance of attention to objects and locations by long-term memory of natural scenes. Becker MW; Rasmussen IP J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1325-38. PubMed ID: 18980397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. Gregg MK; Samuel AG J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):974-91. PubMed ID: 18665739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forming and updating object representations without awareness: evidence from motion-induced blindness. Mitroff SR; Scholl BJ Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(8):961-7. PubMed ID: 15695181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eye movements during change detection: implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies. Zelinsky GJ Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):209-25. PubMed ID: 11281097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Lavie N Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 16413514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of gist in scene recognition. Sampanes AC; Tseng P; Bridgeman B Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2275-83. PubMed ID: 18692519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory. Foulsham T; Kingstone A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 22506754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anticipation in Real-World Scenes: The Role of Visual Context and Visual Memory. Coco MI; Keller F; Malcolm GL Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 40(8):1995-2024. PubMed ID: 26519097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is visual attention required for robust picture memory? Wolfe JM; Horowitz TS; Michod KO Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):955-64. PubMed ID: 17306854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does scene context always facilitate retrieval of visual object representations? Nakashima R; Yokosawa K Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Apr; 18(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 21327383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance. Foulsham T; Alan R; Kingstone A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2008-25. PubMed ID: 21647804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]