These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12760942)
1. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. Leconte I; Feger C; Galant C; Berlière M; Berg BV; D'Hoore W; Maldague B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jun; 180(6):1675-9. PubMed ID: 12760942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions: detection and classification with high-resolution sonography. Buchberger W; Niehoff A; Obrist P; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Dünser M Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2000 Aug; 21(4):325-36. PubMed ID: 11014255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers. Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts. Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic mammography and ultrasonography for palpable and nonpalpable breast cancer in women aged 30 to 39 years. Osako T; Iwase T; Takahashi K; Iijima K; Miyagi Y; Nishimura S; Tada K; Makita M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F Breast Cancer; 2007; 14(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 17690501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome]. Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Corsetti V; Ferrari A; Ghirardi M; Bergonzini R; Bellarosa S; Angelini O; Bani C; Ciatto S Radiol Med; 2006 Apr; 111(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 16683089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 201Tl scintigraphy in the evaluation of palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation with mammography and ultrasonography. Vural G; Atasever T; Ozdemir A; Oznur I; Karabacak NI; Gökçora N; Işik S; Unlü M Nuklearmedizin; 1997 Dec; 36(8):282-8. PubMed ID: 17068879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. Crystal P; Strano SD; Shcharynski S; Koretz MJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 12818853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography? Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A clinical, mammographic, sonographic and histologic evaluation of breast cancer. Meden H; Neues KP; Röben-Kämpken S; Kuhn W Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Feb; 48(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 7789593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. Kim EK; Ko KH; Oh KK; Kwak JY; You JK; Kim MJ; Park BW AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 18430833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A single institution review of new breast malignancies identified solely by sonography. Greene T; Cocilovo C; Estabrook A; Chinitz L; Giuliano C; Rosenbaum Smith S; Tartter PI J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Dec; 203(6):894-8. PubMed ID: 17116558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic appearance of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. Lam WW; Chu WC; Tse GM; Ma TK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):1069-74. PubMed ID: 15039190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To evaluate the role of sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts. Masroor I; Ahmed MN; Pasha S J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 May; 59(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 19438134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]