These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12761056)

  • 1. Corrected small-sample estimation of the Bayes error.
    Brun M; Sabbagh DL; Kim S; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2003 May; 19(8):944-51. PubMed ID: 12761056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is cross-validation better than resubstitution for ranking genes?
    Braga-Neto U; Hashimoto R; Dougherty ER; Nguyen DV; Carroll RJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 14734317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules.
    Hua J; Xiong Z; Lowey J; Suh E; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1509-15. PubMed ID: 15572470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How many samples are needed to build a classifier: a general sequential approach.
    Fu WJ; Dougherty ER; Mallick B; Carroll RJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 15297303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error-dependency relationships for the naïve Bayes classifier with binary features.
    Kuncheva LI; Hoare ZS
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2008 Apr; 30(4):735-40. PubMed ID: 18276977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification?
    Braga-Neto UM; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Feb; 20(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 14960464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian hierarchical error model for analysis of gene expression data.
    Cho H; Lee JK
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2016-25. PubMed ID: 15044230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating concentration estimation errors in ELISA microarray experiments.
    Daly DS; White AM; Varnum SM; Anderson KK; Zangar RC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():17. PubMed ID: 15673468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What should be expected from feature selection in small-sample settings.
    Sima C; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2430-6. PubMed ID: 16870934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regularized Least Squares Cancer classifiers from DNA microarray data.
    Ancona N; Maglietta R; D'Addabbo A; Liuni S; Pesole G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S2. PubMed ID: 16351746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification with reject option in gene expression data.
    Hanczar B; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(17):1889-95. PubMed ID: 18621758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing-value estimation using linear and non-linear regression with Bayesian gene selection.
    Zhou X; Wang X; Dougherty ER
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(17):2302-7. PubMed ID: 14630659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian mixture model based clustering of replicated microarray data.
    Medvedovic M; Yeung KY; Bumgarner RE
    Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(8):1222-32. PubMed ID: 14871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved variance estimation of classification performance via reduction of bias caused by small sample size.
    Wickenberg-Bolin U; Göransson H; Fryknäs M; Gustafsson MG; Isaksson A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():127. PubMed ID: 16533392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel strategy for microarray quality control using Bayesian networks.
    Hautaniemi S; Edgren H; Vesanen P; Wolf M; Järvinen AK; Yli-Harja O; Astola J; Kallioniemi O; Monni O
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(16):2031-8. PubMed ID: 14594707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons and validation of statistical clustering techniques for microarray gene expression data.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Mar; 19(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 12611800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
    Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ties problem resulting from counting-based error estimators and its impact on gene selection algorithms.
    Zhou X; Mao KZ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2507-15. PubMed ID: 16908500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.