404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12761943)
1. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant.
Shallop JK; Facer GW; Peterson A
Laryngoscope; 1999 Nov; 109(11):1755-9. PubMed ID: 10569402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.
Mason S
Int J Audiol; 2004 Dec; 43 Suppl 1():S33-8. PubMed ID: 15732380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using evoked compound action potentials to assess activation of electrodes and predict C-levels in the Tempo+ cochlear implant speech processor.
Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldán C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):134-45. PubMed ID: 19838116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between NRT measurement and behavioural levels in patients with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant.
Di Nardo W; Ippolito S; Quaranta N; Cadoni G; Galli J
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Oct; 23(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 15108484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural response telemetry in cochlear implant users.
Kiss JG; Tóth F; Nagy AL; Jarabin J; Szamosközi A; Torkos A; Jóri J; Czigner J
Int Tinnitus J; 2003; 9(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 14763333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the Nucleus24 cochlear implants].
Tian Y; Li W; Wang Z; Yang N; Hui L; Jiang X
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 26(22):1014-6, 1019. PubMed ID: 23379111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
