173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12762453)
1. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of adjustment for referral bias on the sensitivity and specificity of single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Miller TD; Hodge DO; Christian TF; Milavetz JJ; Bailey KR; Gibbons RJ
Am J Med; 2002 Mar; 112(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 11893368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests.
He H; McDermott MP
Biostatistics; 2012 Jan; 13(1):32-47. PubMed ID: 21856650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.
Bates AS; Margolis PA; Evans AT
J Pediatr; 1993 Apr; 122(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 8463905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of work-up (verification) bias correction in assessing the accuracy of SPECT thallium-201 testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Cecil MP; Kosinski AS; Jones MT; Taylor A; Alazraki NP; Pettigrew RI; Weintraub WS
J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Jul; 49(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 8691222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian estimation for performance measures of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Aragon DC; Martinez EZ; Achcar JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):821-34. PubMed ID: 20496208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Implication of inverse-probability weighting method in the evaluation of diagnostic test with verification bias].
Kang L; Zhang S; Zhao F; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 35(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 24831638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognising bias in studies of diagnostic tests part 2: interpreting and verifying the index test.
Kea B; Hall MK; Wang R
Emerg Med J; 2019 Aug; 36(8):501-505. PubMed ID: 31221671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: A tutorial using R.
Arifin WN; Yusof UK
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1709-1727. PubMed ID: 35043447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Jackknife empirical likelihood confidence regions for the evaluation of continuous-scale diagnostic tests with verification bias.
Wang B; Qin G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2120-2137. PubMed ID: 24368764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combining biomarker trajectories to improve diagnostic accuracy in prospective cohort studies with verification bias.
Li H; Gatsonis C
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(11):1968-1990. PubMed ID: 30590870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Partial verification bias and incorporation bias affected accuracy estimates of diagnostic studies for biomarkers that were part of an existing composite gold standard.
Karch A; Koch A; Zapf A; Zerr I; Karch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Oct; 78():73-82. PubMed ID: 27107877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognising Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests Part 1: Patient Selection.
Hall MK; Kea B; Wang R
Emerg Med J; 2019 Jul; 36(7):431-434. PubMed ID: 31302605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating diagnostic accuracy in the face of multiple reference standards.
Naaktgeboren CA; de Groot JA; van Smeden M; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Ann Intern Med; 2013 Aug; 159(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23922065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
