These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12762453)

  • 21. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: impact of verification bias.
    Lauer MS; Murthy SC; Blackstone EH; Okereke IC; Rice TW
    Arch Intern Med; 2007 Jan; 167(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 17242317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Verification bias an underrecognized source of error in assessing the efficacy of medical imaging.
    Petscavage JM; Richardson ML; Carr RB
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 21145764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Reference standards in diagnostic research: problems and solutions].
    de Groot JA; Reitsma JB; Moons K
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 159():A7202. PubMed ID: 25589276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
    Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Weighted generalized score test for comparing predictive values in the presence of verification bias.
    Wu Y
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4838-4859. PubMed ID: 35929435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. bcROCsurface: an R package for correcting verification bias in estimation of the ROC surface and its volume for continuous diagnostic tests.
    To Duc K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):503. PubMed ID: 29151019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Understanding the direction of bias in studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Kohn MA; Carpenter CR; Newman TB
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1194-206. PubMed ID: 24238322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel Internet-based tool for correcting apparent sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests to adjust for referral (verification) bias.
    Danias PG; Parker JA
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(2):e4. PubMed ID: 11896234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.
    Rodenberg C; Zhou XH
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1256-62. PubMed ID: 11129488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing sensitivity and specificity of medical imaging tests when verification bias is present: The concept of relative diagnostic accuracy.
    Filleron T
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():32-35. PubMed ID: 29279167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.
    Collins J; Huynh M
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(24):4141-69. PubMed ID: 24910172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality.
    Glueck DH; Lamb MM; O'Donnell CI; Ringham BM; Brinton JT; Muller KE; Lewin JM; Alonzo TA; Pisano ED
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jan; 9():4. PubMed ID: 19154609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparing Rasch analyses probability estimates to sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios when examining the utility of medical diagnostic tests.
    Cipriani D; Fox C; Khuder S; Boudreau N
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(2):180-201. PubMed ID: 15795486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
    Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Direct estimation of volume under the ROC surface with verification bias.
    Shi S; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):553-581. PubMed ID: 37470408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An interactive web-based tool for detecting verification (work-up) bias in studies of the efficacy of diagnostic imaging.
    Richardson ML; Petscavage JM
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Dec; 17(12):1580-3. PubMed ID: 20926316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
    Walsh T
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
    Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.