These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12762515)
21. Accuracy of dental registrations in forensic odontology among dentists and dental students. Sand LP; Rasmusson LG; Borrman H J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Jun; 12(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 9227084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new algorithm for use in computer identification. Williams AB; Friedman RB; Lorton L J Forensic Sci; 1989 May; 34(3):682-6. PubMed ID: 2738566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition. Sweet D; Bowers CM J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations. Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is re-creation of human identity possible using tooth prints? An experimental study to aid in identification. Gupta N; Jadhav K; Ahmed Mujib BR; Amberkar VS Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):67-71. PubMed ID: 19716244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dental print media and their value in forensic odontology. Alt KW; Walz M J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1999 Jun; 17(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 10709556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Amalgam tattoo as a means for person identification. Slabbert H; Ackermann GL; Altini M J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1991 Jun; 9(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 1814936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dental characteristics of a large military population useful for identification. Friedman RB; Cornwell KA; Lorton L J Forensic Sci; 1989 Nov; 34(6):1357-64. PubMed ID: 2584944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A hierarchical system for the coding of dental information in reports and computer-assisted identifications. Solheim T J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1997 Jun; 15(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9497748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dental identification after two mass disasters in Croatia. Dumancić J; Kaić Z; Njemirovskij V; Brkić H; Zecević D Croat Med J; 2001 Dec; 42(6):657-62. PubMed ID: 11740850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Computer-Assisted Postmortem Identification (CAPMI) System: a computer-based identification program. Lorton L; Rethman M; Friedman R J Forensic Sci; 1988 Jul; 33(4):977-84. PubMed ID: 3171510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Charts, radiographs, study models: a forensic trilogy. Funaro VM Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):100-1. PubMed ID: 16471407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 1; The development of "SCIP" and the similarity index. Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 9227070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are a minimum number of concordant matches needed to establish identity in forensic odontology? Acharya AB; Taylor JA J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2003 Jun; 21(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 12793125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A simple overlay system for data comparison in dental identification. Jones GF J Forensic Sci; 1988 Jan; 33(1):254-9. PubMed ID: 3351463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiographic recognition of dental implants as an aid to identifying the deceased. Berketa JW; Hirsch RS; Higgins D; James H J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 20002257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]