These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12762515)

  • 41. Computer-aided dental identification: an objective method for assessment of radiographic image similarity.
    Flint DJ; Brent Dove S; Brumit PC; White M; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jan; 54(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19040666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Examination of the degree of agreement among dental findings used for personal identification (report 5)--canonical correlation between dental findings on dental charts and those on radiographs].
    Komuro T; Tsutsumi H; Takahashi T; Tsutsumi D; Shibata H
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Dec; 50(6):390-9. PubMed ID: 8997083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Procedures for the collection of dental records for person identification.
    Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2007 Dec; 25(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 18183690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Advantages of the digital X-ray system in dental identification of persons with reference to two murder cases.
    Hanaoka Y; Ueno A; Minaguchi K; Kajiwara M; Sato Y; Oshida M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2001 Dec; 19(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 11813496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Design and use of a computer-assisted postmortem identification system.
    Lorton L; Langley WH
    J Forensic Sci; 1986 Jul; 31(3):972-81. PubMed ID: 3755465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
    Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology.
    Steadman DW; Adams BJ; Konigsberg LW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Sep; 131(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 16485302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition.
    Freeman AJ; Senn DR; Arendt DM
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 16382842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Thai tsunami victim identification overview to date.
    James H
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2005 Jun; 23(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16224829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A hotel fire.
    Petersen KB
    Int Dent J; 1975 Sep; 25(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 1057532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dentists' qualifications affect the accuracy of radiographic identification.
    Soomer H; Lincoln MJ; Ranta H; Penttilä A; Leibur E
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1121-6. PubMed ID: 14535679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Lessons learned from large-scale comparative dental analysis following the South Asian tsunami of 2004.
    Kieser JA; Laing W; Herbison P
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 16423233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe Photoshop.
    Bollinger SA; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 19187451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Importance of dental records for victim identification following the Indian Ocean tsunami disaster in Thailand.
    Petju M; Suteerayongprasert A; Thongpud R; Hassiri K
    Public Health; 2007 Apr; 121(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 17276465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The gander disaster: dental identification in a military tragedy.
    Brannon RB; Morlang WM; Smith BC
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1331-5. PubMed ID: 14640281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. WinID2 versus CAPMI4: two computer-assisted dental identification systems.
    Lewis C
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):536-8. PubMed ID: 12051332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Lack of dental uniqueness between two bite mark suspects.
    Pretty IA; Turnbull MD
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1487-91. PubMed ID: 11714165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Computer-assisted dental identification.
    McGivney J; Fixott RH
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):309-25. PubMed ID: 11370457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Difficulties in personal identification caused by unreliable dental records.
    Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Przystańska A; Glapiński M; Kociemba W; Żaba C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Nov; 20(8):1135-8. PubMed ID: 24237837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Proposal for internet-based Digital Dental Chart for personal dental identification in forensics.
    Hanaoka Y; Ueno A; Tsuzuki T; Kajiwara M; Minaguchi K; Sato Y
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 16472953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.