These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12762604)

  • 1. Marginal microleakage of two fissure sealants: a comparative study.
    Pérez-Lajarín L; Cortés-Lillo O; García-Ballesta C; Cózar-Hidalgo A
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 12762604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage evaluation of a flowable polyacid-modified resin composite used as fissure sealant on air-abraded permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Turgut MD; Attar N; Altay N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 12760698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of one-bottle adhesive as an intermediate bonding layer to reduce sealant microleakage on saliva-contaminated enamel.
    Hebling J; Feigal RJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11763928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laser and visible light cured pit and fissure sealants--comparison of microleakage at enamel-sealant interface: an in vitro study.
    Vinay C; Prabhakar AR; Raju OS
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Mar; 20(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 12435031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal microleakage of a sealant applied to permanent enamel: evaluation of 3 application protocols.
    Asselin ME; Fortin D; Sitbon Y; Rompré PH
    Pediatr Dent; 2008; 30(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 18402096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different preparation techniques on the microleakage of compomer and resin fissure sealants.
    Eronat N; Bardakçi Y; Sipahi M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 14998210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal seal of sealant and compomer materials with and without enameloplasty.
    Salama FS; Al-Hammad NS
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 Jan; 12(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 11853247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing.
    Courson F; Renda AM; Attal JP; Bouter D; Ruse D; Degrange M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15008338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage and sealant penetration in contaminated carious fissures.
    Hevinga MA; Opdam NJ; Frencken JE; Bronkhorst EM; Truin GJ
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):909-14. PubMed ID: 17961903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel.
    Irinoda Y; Matsumura Y; Kito H; Nakano T; Toyama T; Nakagaki H; Tsuchiya T
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 11203831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of surface roughness and microleakage of fissure sealants following organic debris removal with Carisolv.
    Yamada Y; Hossain M; Shimizu Y; Kimura Y; Masuda Y; Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K
    J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18179855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of a self-etching adhesive on previously etched intact enamel and its effect on sealant microleakage and tag formation.
    Celiberti P; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 15683898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four-year water storage in vitro.
    Cehreli ZC; Gungor HC
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19058684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of an adhesive system used as a fissure sealant.
    Bonifacio CC; Navarro RS; Sardenberg F; Imparato JC; de Carvalho RC; Raggio DP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Mar; 10(2):26-33. PubMed ID: 19279969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shear strength of sealants placed with non-rinse conditioning compared to a conventional acid etch-rinse technique.
    Fuks AB; Eidelman E; Lewinstein I
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):239-42, 233. PubMed ID: 12613304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength of 4 sealants using conventional etch and a self-etching primer.
    Al-Sarheed M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16734312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant versus bonding system when applied following contamination.
    Duangthip D; Lussi A
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 14649617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of a conventional sealant and a flowable composite on minimally invasive prepared fissures.
    Francescut P; Lussi A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 17024941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of microleakage of a pit and fissure sealant placed after preparation by Er:YAG laser in permanent molars.
    Lupi-Pegurier L; Bertrand MF; Muller-Bolla M; Rocca JP; Bolla M
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 14528774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.