These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12763987)

  • 1. Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers.
    Gray J; Orr D; Majeed A
    BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7399):1130. PubMed ID: 12763987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomised crossover trial comparing the performance of Clinical Terms Version 3 and Read Codes 5 byte set coding schemes in general practice.
    Brown PJ; Warmington V; Laurence M; Prevost AT
    BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7399):1127. PubMed ID: 12763986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The London low emission zone baseline study.
    Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of care for chronic illness in primary care: opportunity for improvement in process and outcome measures.
    Ornstein SM; Jenkins RG
    Am J Manag Care; 1999 May; 5(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 10537868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model for the evaluation of computerised codes. The Gabrieli Medical Nomenclature as an example.
    Bolton P; Mira M; Usher H; Prior G
    Aust Fam Physician; 1997 Jul; 26 Suppl 2():S76-8. PubMed ID: 9254946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation in the recording of diabetes diagnostic data in primary care computer systems: implications for the quality of care.
    Rollason W; Khunti K; de Lusignan S
    Inform Prim Care; 2009; 17(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 19807953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes.
    Khunti K; Ganguli S; Baker R; Lowy A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 May; 51(466):356-60. PubMed ID: 11360698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Achievement of metabolic targets for diabetes by English primary care practices under a new system of incentives.
    Gulliford MC; Ashworth M; Robotham D; Mohiddin A
    Diabet Med; 2007 May; 24(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 17381507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can general practice data be used for needs assessment and health care planning in an inner-London district?
    Scobie S; Basnett I; McCartney P
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):475-83. PubMed ID: 8639350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London.
    Feder G; Griffiths C; Highton C; Eldridge S; Spence M; Southgate L
    BMJ; 1995 Dec; 311(7018):1473-8. PubMed ID: 8520339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lack of agreement in pediatric emergency department discharge diagnoses from clinical and administrative data sources.
    Gorelick MH; Knight S; Alessandrini EA; Stanley RM; Chamberlain JM; Kuppermann N; Alpern ER;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jul; 14(7):646-52. PubMed ID: 17554009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survey and audit of diabetes care in general practice in south London.
    Chesover D; Tudor-Miles P; Hilton S
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Jul; 41(348):282-5. PubMed ID: 1747266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Representation of ophthalmology concepts by electronic systems: intercoder agreement among physicians using controlled terminologies.
    Hwang JC; Yu AC; Casper DS; Starren J; Cimino JJ; Chiang MF
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 16488013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a model for the evaluation of clinical coding systems.
    Bolton P; Warren J
    Aust Fam Physician; 2001 Aug; 30(8):814-6. PubMed ID: 11681160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectations outpace reality: physicians' use of care management tools for patients with chronic conditions.
    Carrier E; Reschovsky J
    Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change; 2009 Dec; (129):1-4. PubMed ID: 20198754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
    Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wood O; Hague N; Valentin T; Van Vlymen J
    Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explaining variation in antidepressant prescribing rates in east London: a cross sectional study.
    Hull SA; Aquino P; Cotter S
    Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 15640295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.