These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12764273)

  • 61. [Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac vessels using a 1.0 molar contrast agent at 1.0 T with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
    Mohrs OK; Oberholzer K; Krummenauer F; Bernhard S; Kalden P; Neufang A; Thelen M; Kreitner KF
    Rofo; 2004 Jul; 176(7):985-91. PubMed ID: 15237341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
    Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Non-invasive vascular imaging of peripheral vessels.
    Reimer P; Landwehr P
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(6):858-72. PubMed ID: 9683688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
    Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
    J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The potential of duplex scanning to replace aorto-iliac and femoro-popliteal angiography.
    Legemate DA; Teeuwen C; Hoeneveld H; Ackerstaff RG; Eikelboom BC
    Eur J Vasc Surg; 1989 Feb; 3(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 2653869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Peripheral arterial disease: clinical and cost comparisons between duplex US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography--a multicenter randomized trial.
    de Vries M; Ouwendijk R; Flobbe K; Nelemans PJ; Kessels AG; Schurink GH; van der Vliet JA; Heijstraten FM; Cuypers PW; Duijm LE; van Engelshoven JM; Hunink MG; de Haan MW
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):401-10. PubMed ID: 16864668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for pre-angiographic evaluation of suspected spinal dural arterial venous fistulas.
    Saindane AM; Boddu SR; Tong FC; Dehkharghani S; Dion JE
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2015 Feb; 7(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 24463440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Endovascular surgery based solely on noninvasive preprocedural imaging.
    Levy MM; Baum RA; Carpenter JP
    J Vasc Surg; 1998 Dec; 28(6):995-1003; discussion 1003-5. PubMed ID: 9845650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for treatment planning in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomised controlled diagnostic trial.
    Vahl AC; Geselschap J; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Smit J; Sala J; Turkcan K; Dijksman LM; Visser MJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 May; 35(5):514-21; discussion 522-3. PubMed ID: 18201915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and Duplex Ultrasound Arterial Mapping (DUAM) prior to infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.
    Soule B; Hingorani A; Ascher E; Kallakuri S; Yorkovich W; Markevich N; Costa T; Schutzer R
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 25(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 12552475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Colour duplex ultrasonography versus angiography in the diagnosis of lower-extremity arterial disease.
    Lai DT; Huber D; Glasson R; Grayndler V; Evans J; Hogg J; Etheridge S
    Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jun; 4(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 8782943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Value of the duplex waveform at the common femoral artery for diagnosing obstructive aortoiliac disease.
    Spronk S; den Hoed PT; de Jonge LC; van Dijk LC; Pattynama PM
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 42(2):236-42; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 16102620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Selection of patients with lower limb arterial occlusive disease for endovascular treatment of the iliac arteries with duplex scanning.
    Boström A; Karacagil S; Löfberg AM; Ljungman C; Nyman R; Logason K; Hellberg A
    Vasc Surg; 2001; 35(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16222382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
    Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss.
    Leiner T; Kessels AG; Schurink GW; Kitslaar PJ; de Haan MW; Tordoir JH; van Engelshoven JM
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Jul; 39(7):435-44. PubMed ID: 15194915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluation of peripheral arterial bypass grafts with multi-detector row CT angiography: comparison with duplex US and digital subtraction angiography.
    Willmann JK; Mayer D; Banyai M; Desbiolles LM; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 14595148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Assessment of complicated arterial bypass grafts: value of contrast-enhanced subtraction magnetic resonance angiography.
    Bendib K; Berthezène Y; Croisille P; Villard J; Douek PC
    J Vasc Surg; 1997 Dec; 26(6):1036-42. PubMed ID: 9423720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Peripheral arterial disease. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the lower leg and foot compared with conventional angiography.
    Cronberg CN; Sjöberg S; Albrechtsson U; Leander P; Lindh M; Norgren L; Danielsson P; Sonesson B; Larsson EM
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12631001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
    Clevert DA; Johnson T; Michaely H; Jung EM; Flach PM; Strautz TI; Clevert DA; Reiser M; Schoenberg SO
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.