BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12764583)

  • 1. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Sailer J; Kabalan N; Herold C; Prokop M
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
    Schmidt EL; Herbig W
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
    Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [New computed radiography technologies in digital radiography].
    Fasbender R; Schaetzing R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 12764585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging].
    Kalender WA
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):379-87. PubMed ID: 12764587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP
    Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR.
    Neitzel U
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):32-8. PubMed ID: 15933078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
    Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Flat-panel detector technology -State-of-the-art and future prospects-].
    Yamazaki T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12766267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.
    Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 11341713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
    Busch HP; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.