These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12764622)

  • 1. Vacuum application through a nonfully dilated cervix: a viable option.
    Sadan O; Ginath S; Gomel A; Lurie S; Rotmensch S; Golan A; Boaz M; Glezerman M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Oct; 268(4):281-3. PubMed ID: 12764622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vacuum assisted delivery in Ecuador for prolonged second stage of labor: maternal-neonatal outcome.
    Chang X; Chedraui P; Ross MG; Hidalgo L; Peñafiel J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 May; 20(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 17674241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage.
    Williams MC; Knuppel RA; O'Brien WF; Weiss A; Spellacy WN; Pietrantoni M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 May; 81(5 ( Pt 1)):688-94. PubMed ID: 8469455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Significance of trial vacuum extraction in the framework of obstetric surgery in vertex presentation].
    Krause W; Frenzel J; Raphael M; Michels W
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1985 Aug; 45(8):539-45. PubMed ID: 4043705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.
    Alexander JM; Leveno KJ; Rouse DJ; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Spong CY; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):917-21. PubMed ID: 17400854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complications associated with the macrosomic fetus.
    Lazer S; Biale Y; Mazor M; Lewenthal H; Insler V
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Jun; 31(6):501-5. PubMed ID: 3735262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of vacuum extraction on umbilical cord blood acid-base measurements.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1996; 5(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8796759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of fetal head circumference on labor outcome: a population-based register study.
    Elvander C; Högberg U; Ekéus C
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Apr; 91(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 22229662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevention of cerebral palsy during labour: role of foetal lactate.
    Borruto F; Comparetto C; Treisser A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jul; 278(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18071726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
    Attilakos G; Sibanda T; Winter C; Johnson N; Draycott T
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1510-5. PubMed ID: 16225571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Instrumental delivery of the fetal head at the time of elective repeat cesarean: a randomized pilot study.
    Bofill JA; Lencki SG; Barhan S; Ezenagu LC
    Am J Perinatol; 2000; 17(5):265-9. PubMed ID: 11110345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Indications and technic of operative vaginal delivery in vertex presentation].
    Gitsch E; Reinold E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(10):653-9. PubMed ID: 6485615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity in midforceps delivery and midpelvis vacuum extraction.
    Baerthlein WC; Moodley S; Stinson SK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):594-7. PubMed ID: 3960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cesarean section for failed vacuum extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal outcomes].
    Miot S; Riethmuller D; Deleplancque K; Teffaud O; Martin M; Maillet R; Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004; 32(7-8):607-12. PubMed ID: 15450259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cesarean section for fetal distress--is the decision interval for delivery significant?].
    Tsankova M; Dimitrov A; Nikolov A; Krŭsteva K
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2005; 44 Suppl 3():24-7. PubMed ID: 16313082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Short-term maternal and neonatal outcomes by mode of delivery. A case-controlled study.
    Benedetto C; Marozio L; Prandi G; Roccia A; Blefari S; Fabris C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 17126475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What happens when vacuum extraction fails?
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Stainmetz S; Ben-Haroush A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Aug; 280(2):243-8. PubMed ID: 19116724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin].
    Bilar M
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.