These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12764717)
1. Connections among authors, readers, and editors...learning from mistakes. Fitzpatrick JJ Appl Nurs Res; 2003 May; 16(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 12764717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. INANE Predatory Publishing Practices Collaborative CANNT J; 2015; 25(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 26882636 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Top 10 Tips for Undertaking Synthesis Research. Knafl K; Whittemore R Res Nurs Health; 2017 Jun; 40(3):189-193. PubMed ID: 28267870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science. Bourgault AM Crit Care Nurse; 2019 Aug; 39(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 31371362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Editing Process-From the Personal to the Professional. Katz A Oncol Nurs Forum; 2019 Jul; 46(4):395-396. PubMed ID: 31225834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The language of scholarship for novice writers. Freysteinson WM J Contin Educ Nurs; 2013 Dec; 44(12):533-4. PubMed ID: 24294894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predatory Journals: What Nurse Educators Need to Know. Fitzpatrick JJ Nurs Educ Perspect; 2015; 36(1):7. PubMed ID: 29194149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts. Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome M West J Nurs Res; 2011 Jun; 33(4):506-21. PubMed ID: 21078915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Receiving feedback from reviewers: how to make the most of criticism. Koop PM Can Oncol Nurs J; 1999; 9(4):148-50. PubMed ID: 10786470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regional associations of medical journal editors: moving from rhetoric to reality. Habibzadeh F Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Jun; 83(6):404. PubMed ID: 15976887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Help for editors: EASE makes things easier. European Association of Science Editors. Law C; Piqueras M Int Microbiol; 2000 Dec; 3(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 11334310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Journal Publishing: A Review of the Basics. Kennedy MS Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):361-371. PubMed ID: 30266551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Publishing in English-language journals. Davis AJ; Tschudin V Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Referencing in transcultural nursing: an ethical analysis. Davidhizar R; Bechtel GA; McEwen M Nurs Forum; 1999; 34(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 10795264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective. Südhof TC PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review in action: the contribution of referees to advancing reliable knowledge. Hanks G Palliat Med; 2005 Jul; 19(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 16111059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsibilities of our journal editors and reviewers. Zandi I Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):2238. PubMed ID: 15253240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]