BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12764854)

  • 1. [Rate discrimination and tone recognition in mandarin-speaking cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei C; Cao K; Wang Z
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Apr; 34(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 12764854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Tone recognition and electrode discrimination in prelingually deafened cochlear-implant listeners].
    Wei CG; Cao KL; Chen XW; Jin X; Zheng ZY; Zeng FG
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 15195586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.
    Wei CG; Cao K; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 15504607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech recognition and language development in prelingually deafened children with multichannel cochlear prosthesis].
    Cao K; Wei C; Wang Z; Jiao Z; Li Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Feb; 35(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12768681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN; Beers M; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The contribution of different cochlear insertion region to Mandarin speech perception in users of cochlear implant].
    Qi B; Liu B; Liu S; Liu H; Dong R; Zhang N; Gong S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 25(10):441-4. PubMed ID: 21809554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tone perception of Mandarin-speaking postlingually deaf implantees using the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Mini System.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():294-8. PubMed ID: 7668677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of simulated telephone speech by cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17182877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nucleus 22-channel cochlear mini-system implantations in Mandarin-speaking patients.
    Huang TS; Wang NM; Liu SY
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 8694134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech discrimination via cochlear implants with two different digital speech processing strategies: preliminary results for 7 patients.
    Dillier N; Bögli H; Spillmann T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():145-53. PubMed ID: 8153560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Tone recognition of REZ-1 multi-channel unilateral cochlear implants for profoundly postlingual deaf adults].
    Tao DD; Chen B
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 91(30):2096-8. PubMed ID: 22093982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing results with deep insertion of cochlear implant electrodes.
    Hodges AV; Villasuso E; Balkany T; Bird PA; Butts S; Lee D; Gomez O
    Am J Otol; 1999 Jan; 20(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 9918173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
    Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic indicators of speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant users: a prospective analysis.
    Shipp DB; Nedzelski JM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():194-6. PubMed ID: 7668633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.