These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12765402)

  • 1. The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 May; 113(5):2861-73. PubMed ID: 12765402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.
    Benoit C; Carlson RJ; King MC; Horn DL; Rubinstein JT
    Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 439():108898. PubMed ID: 37890241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC; Poroy O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 11206166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1166-72. PubMed ID: 11303930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.
    Loizou PC; Dorman M; Poroy O; Spahr T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive factors contribute to speech perception in cochlear-implant users and age-matched normal-hearing listeners under vocoded conditions.
    O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):195. PubMed ID: 31370651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
    Nelson PB; Jin SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
    Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.
    Drennan WR; Anderson ES; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e92-8. PubMed ID: 24552679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.
    DiNino M; Arenberg JG
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518770959. PubMed ID: 29708065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.
    Jeon EK; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Henry BA; Gantz BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2350-8. PubMed ID: 26520316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Chinchilla S; Galvin JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 15492884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.
    O'Neill ER; Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):151-167. PubMed ID: 30456730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
    Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.