These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1276615)
1. Letter: Evaluation of a new screen/film combination. Hay GA Br J Radiol; 1976 Mar; 49(579):294. PubMed ID: 1276615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of the stability of parameters of direct radiographic devices]. Chikirdin EG; Zakharova VI Med Tekh; 1998; (6):44-7. PubMed ID: 9949992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Technical note. Evaluation of a new screen/film combination. Evans AL; Davison M; McLellan J; James WB Br J Radiol; 1975 Oct; 48(574):858-9. PubMed ID: 1191907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of x-ray technique. Cullinan J; Cullinan A Radiol Technol; 1995; 66(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 7644610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The continuous assessment of X-ray tubes and generators. Price R Radiography; 1981 Jan; 47(553):2-15. PubMed ID: 7232700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Image quality test for video amplifier and television units]. Dümmling K Rontgenpraxis; 1969 Aug; 22(8):190-205. PubMed ID: 5352474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of film processing with concentrated solutions. Manson-Hing LR; Turgut E Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1973 Aug; 36(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 4515762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of non-screen film with an automatic timer. Pexman JH Br J Radiol; 1966 Jan; 39(457):70-3. PubMed ID: 5902408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. X-ray sensitometer for screen-film combinations used in medical radiology. Haus AG; Rossmann K Radiology; 1970 Mar; 94(3):673-8. PubMed ID: 5413910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance characteristics of X-ray tubes and generators. Harrison RM; Forster E Radiography; 1984; 50(594):245-8. PubMed ID: 6505169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography. Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Television set for visual analysis of roentgenograms]. Zhukov EM; Kozlovskiĭ EB Med Tekh; 1975; (2):52-4. PubMed ID: 1226102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of X-ray system performance by external instrumentation. Driller J; Goodwin PN; Katz LL J Assoc Adv Med Instrum; 1972; 6(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 5035679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Adjustment of the film tension and the film=screen combination in the detection of low contrast in x-ray diagnosis. II: Interpretation of the results and clinical implications]. Wust P; Hunger J; Claussen C; Felix R Rontgenpraxis; 1990 Jan; 43(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 2405504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Photo-effect of the fluorescence from the opposite intensifying screen on the emulsion of the x-ray film]. Tanaka Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1971 Feb; 30(11):131-5. PubMed ID: 5291799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the 3M Trimax system. Marsh AJ Radiography; 1978 Feb; 44(518):56-8. PubMed ID: 625550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Registration of failures (defects) in electric circuits of the x-ray apparatus]. Tretiakov VV Med Tekh; 1975; (2):32-4. PubMed ID: 1226093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Film for exposure from the screen of an x-ray electron-optical transducer]. Leonova NI; Sidorov IuD; Dmitriev GI; Kameneva SI; Kotliarov PM Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1982; (4):59-61. PubMed ID: 7135811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]