These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12766272)

  • 1. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
    Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
    Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems (initial experiences and physical evaluation).
    Gomi T; Koshida K; Miyati T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Dec; 19(4):362-70. PubMed ID: 16763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An experience of the clinical study with angiography system using a Flat Panel Detector].
    Okusako K; Shogaki M; Yokoyama K; Ogawa T; Tanaka K; Ichida T; Kishimoto K; Hatagawa M; Okuyama K; Kudoh H; Tanaka S; Nakamura K; Ikeda S; Suzuki K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 12766271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Imaging characteristics evaluation of a digital radiography system.
    Moro L; Pannella A; Bassetti C; Fantinato D; Baldi M; Bertoli G
    Radiol Med; 2003; 106(1-2):94-102. PubMed ID: 12951556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Flat-panel detector technology -State-of-the-art and future prospects-].
    Yamazaki T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12766267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flat panel detector-based cone-beam volume CT angiography imaging: system evaluation.
    Ning R; Chen B; Yu R; Conover D; Tang X; Ning Y
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Sep; 19(9):949-63. PubMed ID: 11127608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.
    Floyd CE; Warp RJ; Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Baydush AH; Vargas-Voracek R; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 11230640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical imaging properties and low-contrast performance of a newly developed flat-panel digital radiographic system.
    Matsumoto M; Yamazaki T; Nokita M; Hayashida S; Yoshida A; Ideguchi T; Himuro K; Ohki M; Kumazawa S; Higashida Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1656-65. PubMed ID: 16395242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
    Sheth NM; Uneri A; Helm PA; Zbijewski W; Siewerdsen JH
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3053-3066. PubMed ID: 35363391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental comparison of flat-panel detector performance for direct and indirect systems.
    Gomi T; Miyagawa J; Hirano H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Dec; 61(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 16395244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography].
    Yokoi T; Takata T; Ichikawa K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1415-25. PubMed ID: 22104233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images.
    Peer S; Neitzel U; Giacomuzzi SM; Peer R; Gassner E; Steingruber I; Jaschke W
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Mar; 20(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 11341713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
    Murai M; Kishimoto K; Tanaka K; Oota K; Ienaga A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1443-8. PubMed ID: 21099174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.