115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12766296)
1. Defects of a mammography quality control phantom visualized by synchrotron radiation imaging.
Imamura K; Fukuda M; Ehara N; Miyamoto K; Kanemaki Y; Umetani K; Ogata H; Nakajima Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 12766296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Structural inhomogeneity in mammography quality control phantoms detected by refraction-enhanced synchrotron radiation imaging.
Imamura K; Ehara N; Inada Y; Kanemaki Y; Nakajima Y; Miyamoto K; Fukuda M; Umetani K; Uesugi K; Ochiai Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2005; 25(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 16373988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic phantom studies with synchrotron radiation.
Johnston RE; Washburn D; Pisano E; Burns C; Thomlinson WC; Chapman LD; Arfelli F; Gmur NF; Zhong Z; Sayers D
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):659-63. PubMed ID: 8756911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM; Dance DR
Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging performance of phase-contrast breast computed tomography with synchrotron radiation and a CdTe photon-counting detector.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Golosio B; Oliva P; Spandre G; Di Lillo F; Fedon C; Longo R; Russo P
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 27160829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens.
Faulconer L; Parham C; Connor DM; Zhong Z; Kim E; Zeng D; Livasy C; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D; Pisano E
Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1329-37. PubMed ID: 19596593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography of a phantom and breast tissue with synchrotron radiation and a linear-array silicon detector.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A
Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 9722850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analyser-based mammography using single-image reconstruction.
Briedis D; Siu KK; Paganin DM; Pavlov KM; Lewis RA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3599-611. PubMed ID: 16030385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synchrotron based planar imaging and digital tomosynthesis of breast and biopsy phantoms using a CMOS active pixel sensor.
Szafraniec MB; Konstantinidis AC; Tromba G; Dreossi D; Vecchio S; Rigon L; Sodini N; Naday S; Gunn S; McArthur A; Olivo A
Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 25498332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality comparison between a phase-contrast synchrotron radiation breast CT and a clinical breast CT: a phantom based study.
Brombal L; Arfelli F; Delogu P; Donato S; Mettivier G; Michielsen K; Oliva P; Taibi A; Sechopoulos I; Longo R; Fedon C
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):17778. PubMed ID: 31780707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pixel Value Measurement of Microcalcification Specks in Digitized X-ray Film Images for Image Quality Assessment: Automatic Procedure Developed Using Excel Functions.
Ehara N; Imamura K; Inada Y; Nakajima Y; Fukuda M; Higashida Y
Igaku Butsuri; 2003; 23(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 14617849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mammography project at the SYRMEP beamline.
Dreossi D; Abrami A; Arfelli F; Bregant P; Casarin K; Chenda V; Cova MA; Longo R; Menk RH; Quai E; Quaia E; Rigon L; Rokvic T; Sanabor D; Tonutti M; Tromba G; Vascotto A; Zanconati F; Castelli E
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S58-62. PubMed ID: 18617344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Synchrotron radiation: a new source in x-ray mammography].
Burattini E; Gambaccini M; Indovina PL; Pocek M; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 1992 Sep; 84(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 1410660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short communication: anomalous image quality phantom scores in magnification mammography: evidence of phase contrast enhancement.
Kotre CJ; Birch IP; Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):170-3. PubMed ID: 11893641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First application of computed radiology to mammography with synchrotron radiation.
Quai E; Longo R; Zanconati F; Jaconelli G; Tonutti M; Abrami A; Arfelli F; Dreossi D; Tromba G; Cova MA
Radiol Med; 2013 Feb; 118(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 22744351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Refraction contrast 11x-magnified X-ray imaging of large objects by MIRRORCLE-type table-top synchrotron.
Hirai T; Yamada H; Sasaki M; Hasegawa D; Morita M; Oda Y; Takaku J; Hanashima T; Nitta N; Takahashi M; Murata K
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2006 Sep; 13(Pt 5):397-402. PubMed ID: 16924136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of exposure factors on image quality in screening mammography.
Alkhalifah K; Brindabhan A; Alsaeed R
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):e99-e102. PubMed ID: 28965911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
