These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12767956)

  • 1. The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Flobbe K; Bosch AM; Kessels AG; Beets GL; Nelemans PJ; von Meyenfeldt MF; van Engelshoven JM
    Arch Intern Med; 2003 May; 163(10):1194-9. PubMed ID: 12767956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast lesions: imaging with contrast-enhanced subharmonic US--initial experience.
    Forsberg F; Piccoli CW; Merton DA; Palazzo JJ; Hall AL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):718-26. PubMed ID: 17690324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection.
    Kaiser JS; Helvie MA; Blacklaw RL; Roubidoux MA
    Radiology; 2002 Jun; 223(3):839-44. PubMed ID: 12034957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for breast cancer in Chinese women using mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and different combinations of these imaging modalities.
    Shao H; Li B; Zhang X; Xiong Z; Liu Y; Tang G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2013; 21(2):283-92. PubMed ID: 23694915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The additional value of US to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. A prospective study.
    Skaane P
    Acta Radiol; 1999 Sep; 40(5):486-90. PubMed ID: 10485236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.
    Zonderland HM; Coerkamp EG; Hermans J; van de Vijver MJ; van Voorthuisen AE
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 10551221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive predictive value of breast cancer in the lesions categorized as BI-RADS category 5.
    Wiratkapun C; Lertsithichai P; Wibulpholprasert B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Aug; 89(8):1253-9. PubMed ID: 17048437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with palpable mammographically noncalcified breast tumors.
    Skaane P; Sager EM; Olsen JB; Abdelnoor M; Berger A; Wolff PA; Kullmann G
    Acta Radiol; 1999 Mar; 40(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10080728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic value of radiological breast imaging in a non-screening population.
    Flobbe K; van der Linden ES; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM
    Int J Cancer; 2001 May; 92(4):616-8. PubMed ID: 11304700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
    Chung M; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Knobel A; Greenwood HI; Ray KM; Joe BN; Lee AY
    Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 32870133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
    Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease.
    Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Rabuffi P; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
    Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):354-65. PubMed ID: 17440697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
    Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
    Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of palpable breast lump.
    Pande AR; Lohani B; Sayami P; Pradhan S
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2003; 1(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 16388202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.